Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
where were you born?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Elaine | Report | 12 Apr 2011 15:00 |
yeah...got the right dennis and catherine,erin.....have followed back from my grandad..all childrens names and ages and all dates tally. also all dates match. got copies of death cert for dennis,and marriage certs for both his marriages.i also knew from my late dad,where his family lived in tyldesley...so everything aok! lol janey,not like you to slip up! i just noticed how catherine is spelt above...with an "a" instead of "e"...thats prob. why i was getting 0 matches when i tried! on the wedding cert of denis to catherine,denis' father ISNT denis..its joseph....so denis wasnt named after his father either,erin |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 12 Apr 2011 14:11 |
I need to put a bag over my head. On page 3 (or was it 2 ...) I said that this was the 1861 census -- of course it was the *1851* census, I've fixed it in that post now for the record: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Eringobragh1916 | Report | 12 Apr 2011 11:44 |
Elaine....Are you sure you have the correct family..!! Ive been after wondering why Dennis and Catherine didn't name the "apparent first son" after Dennis'father...Dennis.... |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Apr 2011 20:26 |
hahaha...its my family rose,and i've TOTALLY lost the plot! there folk joining the family that i never even heard of!! and they spell their names all sorts of ways,to make it even more confusing! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 11 Apr 2011 20:20 |
ah sorry Janey lol I have been following this intermittently but have lost the plot ;) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Apr 2011 20:09 |
did see it on page 3 janey,but i thought you wanted me to check if john did marry gertrude? y u think they werent a couple? i'm still looking for mary ann...found a mary ann greatrex,b.1844 in derbyshire(bakewell)but her parents were thomas and elizabeth |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 11 Apr 2011 19:54 |
Rose ... I posted that quite a while back ... check page 3 ... I don't think they were a couple; there's a Hannah Greatorex death that would match. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Rambling | Report | 11 Apr 2011 19:45 |
Marriages Jun 1838 (>99%) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Apr 2011 19:37 |
dont know how but i got onto international genealogical index! put in surname greatrex and spouse surname rice...ploughed thro hundreds of names till i got to G. there 3 johns married on diff. dates-----then i put rice in first and john in spouse box.....had to go even further down to the R's. found gertrude rice and her wedding was same date and place as one of the johns....6th June.1838. Duffield. Derbyshire. so they were obviously married |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 11 Apr 2011 17:19 |
It was probably a mistranscription thats why. but if you are using this site I dont think it allows for those...maybe wrong |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Apr 2011 17:10 |
i spelling with an e not an a .thought it would b simple with an unusual name,but its spelt all ways! will carry on plodding! i up till round 1am every day...its so exciting when something is found! i'm also trying to do my husbands family,but that wholly(we think!)in ireland |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 11 Apr 2011 16:34 |
what site were you using if its this one the spelling has to be correct? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Apr 2011 16:28 |
remember seeing that on page 2....i must admit,i've read and re-read everything thats been put down! i am so humbled that people would go to such lengths to help me. am now looking re mary ann greatrex(will try the other spellings too) but i dont know how you find them--i put catherine rice 1837 in 1851 census and it said no matches! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 11 Apr 2011 16:11 |
Remember this on page 2: |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Apr 2011 15:22 |
"hands up in the air"!! you've lost me....that grand-daughter being mary ann greatorex? i'll see if i can see any marriage cert or baptism for her. should be easier with an unusual name(on my other side i was searching for a smith!) you must have the patience of a saint janey! i find myself going into the same things over and over,forgetting where i saw things,etc i have loads of scrap papers with stuff jotted down,then cant remember wot it is! comes with old age i suppose..memory not quite so sharp! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 11 Apr 2011 14:38 |
Just to follow up on that 1861 household with the absent husband/father, |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Apr 2011 14:18 |
thnx a million jax..will look now.....thought i had done EVERY census,EVERY possible dates and EVERY posiible spelling!! obviously i missed this....only just ad mi glasses changed too,so cant use that as an excuse! lol |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jax | Report | 11 Apr 2011 12:19 |
It is the 1851 census that Janey posted above catharine Rice 1837 Bridget is another lodger with her |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Elaine | Report | 11 Apr 2011 11:56 |
thnx janey..i really do appreciate all the help. but WHERE did you find catherine and bridget in census? i looked everywhere and didnt see em! xx |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 11 Apr 2011 01:44 |
It's a coincidence only, Elaine. |
|||
Researching: |