Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
DIFFICULTY FINDING IN 1901 AND 1911 CENSUS
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
rosalie | Report | 7 Mar 2011 19:47 |
the following family can be found up to and including the 1891 census but not after that in either the 1901 or 1911 census. |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:10 |
Do you know if they were definitely in this country in 1911 or 1901? |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:11 |
Hello Rosalie, what was James' occupation on the marriage record, or on any of the census you have found? |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:18 |
I cannot see a birth for Thomas Alan, have you got any of the certificates? |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:19 |
Marriage record, for info: |
|||
|
Chris Ho :) | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:20 |
Name: James Baker Reeves (General Dealer) |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:21 |
Just for information: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:23 |
Seeing as they didn't marry until 1889 the children born before then are from Sarah Ann's first marriage and probably registered under the name of Norton. It's likely that in the 1891 they were on the census under James' surname but under their own in later years. |
|||
|
rosalie | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:24 |
hi and thanks. to reply to you first patchem, no i dont know anything for definate-and yes i am a descendent. |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:26 |
Descendent of which one, so we know who is alive in 1901 and 1911? |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:26 |
?/ |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:28 |
Name: James Frederick Norton |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:29 |
Here's the Norton's in 1881: |
|||
|
rosalie | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:30 |
descended from james who would have been my gt grandad |
|||
|
rosalie | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:32 |
i have searched for the children under this marriage under both surnames-still got nowhere |
|||
|
patchem | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:32 |
Does James show as Norton or Baker on his marriage certificate? |
|||
|
rosalie | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:35 |
yes i was aware of this norton marriage-nortons and also found them lastly on the 1891 census |
|||
|
MarieCeleste | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:35 |
Rosalie, do you mean descended from James F b1879? |
|||
|
rosalie | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:38 |
i take it we`re now talking about james f.? sometimes he used norton other times baker-really confusing but he used baker on his second marriage in 1916 to my gran at saltash, cornwall |
|||
|
rosalie | Report | 7 Mar 2011 20:40 |
his (james frederick baker/norton) 1st marriage was to amy elizabeth clemson, in 1907 she died 1908 |