Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Ruth
|
Report
|
2 Aug 2011 08:10 |
Yes Florrie was with them at an early age but they were not her parents which was known throughout the family. The next cencus with Rose only confirms this with the words niece.
All I know about the adoption is that Florrie went into a chilrens home for a few years, could be before Rose was born or after. Both William and a brother wanted to adopt one child each but they were told the sisters had to be kept together.
It looks very much like Mary Ellen Smith was in a prison in 1881 at the age of 16. In 1888 when Florrie was born there is a Mary Ellen Smith age 20 being trialled and sentenced in 1889 but I cannot see the full details.
|
|
Astra
|
Report
|
2 Aug 2011 13:33 |
Oh Ruth. Never order Certificates through Ancestry. They charge far too much. Order only through the GRO or from the local registry office which will cost you just under £10. I appreciate what you are saying but it is pointless taking details from trees on Ancestry because many of them contain totally incorrect information and people see it and copy it and so it goes on and on from tree to tree. As for trying to find who Mum is. Get the certificates first if you can and then we can take it from there.
|
|
lancashireAnn
|
Report
|
2 Aug 2011 16:58 |
why do you think that the Mary Ellen Smith who was in sentenced in 1889 (for theft) was yours please? It was not exactly an uncommon name. She was 'a woman of loose character' living at 20 Brown st., Stockport Road, Manchester at the time of the charge.
Where was your Mary Ellen born please?
|
|
Ruth
|
Report
|
2 Aug 2011 23:14 |
Hi Ann
We knew that a sister of William was given the name of being the black sheep and was always in trouble with the law so it may well be Mary as the Mary in prison in 1881 does appear to be William's sister.
I couldn't find anything else for Mary Ellen Smith. Now yes she could have married but this is why I was trying to determine whether the Mary Ellen Smith being sentenced in 1888 was the same Mary.
It could well be pure coincidence and fit in too neatly with my details but and it is just a but, what if she was the girls mother (I will verify this with birth certs when I can) So being sentenced in 1888 and imprisoned for a year from 1889, out in aprox 1890, got pregnant again and had second child in 1901, well it does fit. I just need to get the records to verify it,
It would tie in with family stories and rumours but until I have real proof its just a possibility out of hundreds and I do know I could be grasping at straws!
Mary Ellen Smith was born Manchester, Lancashire, England in 1865.
This family is a right one to sort out!
|
|
lancashireAnn
|
Report
|
2 Aug 2011 23:24 |
it does seem a likely scenario - how to prove???
I may have misled you about Mary Ellen's age in 1888 - I think I misread her address house no (20) and interpreted it as her age as on re-reading the articles I could not see an age mentioned
|
|
Ruth
|
Report
|
3 Aug 2011 08:20 |
1881 Cencus Name: Mary Ellen SMITH, Age: 16, Estimated Birth Year: abt 1865 Relation: Prisoner Gender: Female Where born: Manchester, Lancashire, England Civil parish: Gorton, County/Island: Lancashire, Country: England Street Address: "H M Prison" Hyde Rd Manchester Occupation: Paper Sorter Registration district: Chorlton Sub-registration district: Ardwick ED, institution, or vessel: Her Majestys Prison Piece: 3912, Folio: 135, Page Number: 26
I found this on a Manchester Gov website Belle Vue Prison (or Manchester Borough Gaol / Manchester City Gaol), Hyde Road, West Gorton was opened in 1849 by the Borough of Manchester. It was a short term Jail, but it proved inadequate and some prisoners were still sent to the New Bailey. It was demolished in 1892. The majority of prisoners were tried at the Manchester Magistrates Court or the Manchester Quarter Sessions (see above). Manchester Archives holds the following records for this prison
Does anyone know how I can get further details on the 1881 sentence and also find out more about the 1888 sentence to see if it is the same Mary? Do I need to go to somewhere in Mancheser to go through the Archives?
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
3 Aug 2011 09:50 |
Who did Rose and Florence marry and when please?
Dea x
|
|
Ruth
|
Report
|
3 Aug 2011 13:01 |
Florence Smith married Patrick Pounder in 1916 in Chorlton. CHO_RM/252/138
Rose Ann(e) Smith married Alexander McKenna in Sept 1919, Chorlton McKenna Alexander Smith Chorlton 8c 2400 Smith Rose A McKenna Chorlton 8c 2400
|
|
Ruth
|
Report
|
25 Aug 2011 08:24 |
sorry to drag up an old thread but I am just ordering the two birth certificates again, or trying to! I have decided to go direct to the Manchester office and I think they said it was £9 so a bit cheaper and the lady said I could return it if it was the wrong one which was useful to know.
Anyway the reason for dragging this up wasn't for that.
I am still struggling to find the prison records for Mary Ann Smith on any of the websites I use for research. Does anyone know where these records might be kept online or would I need to go to the archives as I don't seem to be able to find anything on the Manchester records site.
|
|
Ozibird
|
Report
|
25 Aug 2011 23:41 |
This is the link to Court & Prison Records Guide, Manchester Archives.
http://www.manchester.gov.uk/site/scripts/documents_info.php?documentID=3808
|
|
Madmeg
|
Report
|
26 Aug 2011 00:39 |
It seems odd that the women were buried together if they married. I passed Southern Cemetery twice today, I could have popped in to see the grave, and check who else was buried in it. Let me know if I can do that for you. I assume you have the plot number. It is probably available online - so have you checked it?
You can apply to the register office that covers Salford and ask that the two births should have the same parents, if you don't trust the GRO references (and perhaps this is not wise). Staff at ROs are usually good at working out what might be right.
Unfortunately, in this hobby, you have to spend money to determine the truth. Family memories are notoriously poor and sometimes downright wrong. Get the certificates and then come back with firm information from them.
|
|
Madmeg
|
Report
|
26 Aug 2011 00:47 |
I forgot to add - contact people who have these people in their trees and ask where they got the information from. In most cases you will get one of two possible answers (a) somebody else told me or (b) I have forgotten.
Ignore them and do your own research. I've recently researched a branch for a friend and no fewer than 14 Ancestry trees had the father as a man who had died 6 years before the child was born!!!! And not one tree had the right father, cos nobody had sent for the birth certificate. Except me.
|
|
Ruth
|
Report
|
26 Aug 2011 11:49 |
Hiya, I've just paid for Florence's birth certificate. I guess I have to accpet its an exppensive hobby but I am enjoying it too much to stop doing. My lovely fella just spent a fortune in hoobycraft on bits for me as well as ebay so I can make a family tree scrapbook.
Gong back to the sisters they are both buried in Southern Cemetary in plot 849. They are with Rose Smith who brough them up as her children, The youngest sister also caled Rose married Alex McKenna who is also buried with them. I can't fuind Florence's husband Patrick or the man who brought them up who was William Henry Smith.
If you don't mind looking that would be amazing.
I very rarely add data from other trees unless I have documents that prove it is correct like cencus or birth records and I never accept that the first possibility is always right. I learnt this after going off in a direction that was totally wrong and I learnt from that!
|
|
Madmeg
|
Report
|
28 Aug 2011 00:00 |
Hi Ruth, yes it can be expensive. Some families more so than others, especially if they moved around the country. But you just can't afford to make guesses or you could be wasting time going down the wrong line.
Seems you already know who was buried in the plot at Southern Cemetery. Did you find this info from the online website? There is probably no headstone, but next time I am passing, I will look. May not be for a while. I have a few others at Southern Cemetery to look at. Despite not being far away, the journey is a bit of a nightmare.
Meg
|
|
Ruth
|
Report
|
4 Sep 2011 19:21 |
Sorry for not replying, got caught up with another stem of my tree. Thanks for the offer next time you visit.
I looked at the records of Southern Cemetary and found them all there in grave 849. I've never been there so don't know if there is a headstone or not.
I still can't find Florence's husband's grave but that one will have to wait for now.
|
|
Ruth
|
Report
|
10 Sep 2011 16:48 |
Ok, so I now have Florence's birth certificate and its caused me even more confusion.
Details are: birth Seventh June 1888 at 2 Richmond Terrace, Salford Father: John Smith, Labourer Mother: Fanny Smith formally Suckling (or Buckling?)
on the signature, description box it says: x The mark of Fanny Smith mother, 2 Richmond Terrace, Salford Registered nineteenth July 1888
Now I'm questioned have I got the right birth certificate as my mum said she was told she shared the same birthday as her on 11th Aug but there is nothing that matches that.
|
|
patchem
|
Report
|
10 Sep 2011 20:54 |
Nowhere near Salford......... Marriages Sep 1885 Johnson Francis Aston 6d 516 xxx Smith John Aston 6d 516 Stych Lucy Elizabeth Aston 6d 516 xxx Suckling Fanny Louisa Aston 6d 516
|
|
Ruth
|
Report
|
11 Sep 2011 01:08 |
Hiya, thanks found it on ancestry, in Warwickshire? I guess its lucky I have now got an unusual surname to work on. Suckling beats Smith anyday!
|
|
Ruth
|
Report
|
11 Sep 2011 01:45 |
possible birth?
Baptism: 26 Aug 1858 St Augustine, Everton, Lancashire, England Fanny Suckling Arthur - Daughter of William Lihou Arthur & Elizabeth Cranfield Abode: 3 Upper Baker St Occupation: Clerk in Holy Orders Notes: Curate of St Augustine Baptised by: J Herbert Jones, Minister Register: Baptisms 1830 - 1872, Page 153, Entry 1224 Source: LDS Film 1656013
|
|
Carol
|
Report
|
11 Sep 2011 08:11 |
Fanny Suckling Arthur died in 1870 and the marriage that was found was for a Fanny Louisa Suckling so not the same person. Regards Carol
|