Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

wakefield york records office

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Flick

Flick Report 9 Jun 2010 15:25

Have you got the 1920 marriage cert?

Karen

Karen Report 9 Jun 2010 17:02

iv followed this one through to 1901 and he married a fanny

Karen

Karen Report 9 Jun 2010 17:06

im really confused i wonder whether there was a spelling misprint like you pointed out. ill keep looking and send for the certs too kind regards karen

Karen

Karen Report 9 Jun 2010 17:12

no .. i spoke to an old family member earlier on, they gave me the last son to be born, to hannah has albert harris, he is still alive in swansea but i have no idea where...so iv looked and found dates names and places that match ... i really hope im not wrong, iv been looking into the 1911 and that edward married a mary... the only one with a son born in 1903 in horbury is the one with the surname has stoker.. king regards karen

Flick

Flick Report 9 Jun 2010 17:26

I hope you're not saying that the info you asked for was all based on guesswork?

If I've misunderstood your last posting - excuse me.................

Karen

Karen Report 9 Jun 2010 17:58

no its not at all. i have a birth cert plus some family back ground information. im sorry if you think iv wasted your time, that was not my intention.. iv been looking for a long time at this part of my family hand have always come up with nothing .. so i saw the records here and thought i would give it a try.. i dont profess to being an expert that is why i posted for help.. kind reagrds karen

Karen

Karen Report 10 Jun 2010 09:03

hi somersetgirl i think you have found something.. have looked at the census for the stoker family and it looks like there is a spelling mistake ..have tried to find all the stoker family in earlier census and cannot trace them.. have sent for all relevent certs and will let you know thanks again to all those helped tankful regards karen

Flick

Flick Report 10 Jun 2010 13:12

No, I wasn't suggesting you'd wasted my time- just concerned for your sake that you may have been chasing the wrong line..........glad to know you are sure you haven't!

Karen

Karen Report 10 Jun 2010 13:34

im not sure at all really, but if i dont start to aliminate, im never going to find what is turning out to be an allusive family. and once again thank you for your help :)