Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Owen Reynolds
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Margaret | Report | 3 May 2010 22:20 |
Thank you very much, I also have found this, I think the wife's name is Dorothy,as her nickname was Dolly.Also in the marriage records the surname is longer McCough, so I think they have shortened it. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 3 May 2010 22:14 |
Hi Clare |
|||
|
Christina(Lancashire) | Report | 3 May 2010 21:20 |
The 1901 shows their relationships a little better.... |
|||
|
Christina(Lancashire) | Report | 3 May 2010 20:28 |
The family in 1871.... |
|||
|
Christina(Lancashire) | Report | 3 May 2010 20:25 |
The family in 1881....childrens names all match with the 1891, but the father is James, a Labourer. |
|||
|
Clare | Report | 3 May 2010 20:20 |
I just had a thought, out of interest, how did you know Peter's father was called Owen? Do you have them all on a census together? |
|||
|
Clare | Report | 3 May 2010 20:18 |
It's a shame there's not an obvious marriage there. Also - there could be a chance Peter was in fact born in Ireland...I don't always trust them when a family's moved. I've spent ages looking in the new places before only to look at the old place just to check...and they were born there. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 3 May 2010 20:14 |
I will need to look into this, it didn't dawn on me that these might be Peter's children, even though I saw that he was a widower |
|||
|
Clare | Report | 3 May 2010 20:09 |
Couldn't see a marriage but I did get this; |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 3 May 2010 20:06 |
Thank you Clare |
|||
|
Clare | Report | 3 May 2010 20:05 |
To go back to your original question; I think maybe they got married in Ireland? Either that or their married isn't on freebmd yet, as it's not complete. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 3 May 2010 20:05 |
That might be an idea, I will look into this Christina thank you |
|||
|
Clare | Report | 3 May 2010 20:02 |
I've just checked the 1891 on Ancestry, it does def say Reynolds on the image (plus he's a way labourer - dock), it must just have been that the person transcribing it couldn't make it out..but it's been corrected on Genes. I think it's the same person. |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 3 May 2010 19:58 |
I think that might be him Clare |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 3 May 2010 19:56 |
If you look in the Genes Reunited census for 1891 in the middlesborough district it comes up with Peter Reynolds occupation as way labourer |
|||
|
Clare | Report | 3 May 2010 19:55 |
Could this be him? He's married but no sign of a wife. |
|||
|
Clare | Report | 3 May 2010 19:45 |
Ok..no wonder I couldn't see him. Thanks :) |
|||
|
Christina(Lancashire) | Report | 3 May 2010 19:44 |
Posting this for info....as Peter was widowed the younger children may be his. It seems unlikely that Margaret would have children with an age difference of 34 years. |
|||
|
Clare | Report | 3 May 2010 19:37 |
Sorry, I still can't see him. Was there a spelling mistake at all? |
|||
|
Margaret | Report | 3 May 2010 19:29 |
It was Peter who is in the 1891 census with the rest of the family under Middlesborough with his date of birth 1855 |