Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Madmeg
|
Report
|
18 Apr 2010 13:24 |
Back to Elizabeth Purnell, seems to be the one Janey found in 1861 with parents/siblings and in 1871 niece of James and Sarah Ridgeon, together with elder sister Ellen (with parents in 1851, servant in 1861).
Richard, does the marriage cert of Elizabeth Purnell give an occupation for her?
|
|
Richard
|
Report
|
18 Apr 2010 10:45 |
Many thanks for that, I'll email them and ask first as I am in Perth, Western Australia. Thanks for your help.
|
|
AuntySherlock
|
Report
|
18 Apr 2010 08:39 |
i would most definitely ask GRO for a legible copy of the certificate. Each piece of accurate evidence you are able to provide to the researchers makes the job so much easier.
Make certain you tell GRO you have a copy and can not read it. If you are in UK are you able to phone them and ask their advice.
|
|
Richard
|
Report
|
18 Apr 2010 06:30 |
AuntySherlock I only have a copy of the Cert which was given to me, not the original. Would I still be able to send that?
|
|
Richard
|
Report
|
18 Apr 2010 06:29 |
Margaret I found out from Elizabeths Death Cert that (she) Elizabeth Purnell was born in Chilcompton, Somerset. She died at the age of 28 in India. So maybe her father William Purnell was born there too? I'll have a look around and see what I can come up with.
|
|
AuntySherlock
|
Report
|
17 Apr 2010 22:22 |
I am following this thread. Not adding much because you lot have it pretty well under control.
I do however have one hint for Richard.
It is about his certificate which he can not read. Because the information on that certificate is vital you need a good copy of it.
Email/contact GRO and tell them about the problem. They will ask you to return the certificate and will send you a typed version.
At least then you will be able to give this information with accuracy.
|
|
Madmeg
|
Report
|
17 Apr 2010 20:02 |
Yep, Purnell is a predominantly Somerset name, other side of the country.
I don't think we're going to get much from her, to solve Richard's problem.
Ada Keens the witness isn't solving anything, and I don't think A Walsh will either.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
17 Apr 2010 18:54 |
MM, she was your Ann Want. ;) I wouldn't worry much about the age in 1841 - she was a domestic servant, ages were rounded - supposedly down, but I wouldn't be hugely surprised at an employer recording a 16-yr-old servant as 20.
The big problem is that I can't find hide or hair of Elizabeth Purnell before her marriage, i.e. 61 and 71. We need that to get a place of birth, to search for her in 1881 as Elizabeth Bird.
Purnell is unfortunately probably an easily mistranscribed name ...
There is but one with father William in 1861, in Somerset, parents William (ag lab) and Martha, born c1856. Can't identify that one positively in 1871 even.
Aha. The parents are mistranscribed as Turnell in 1871 -- and someone has corrected the name at Ancestry:
"Looks more like Purnell and there is a marriage of William Purnell to Martha Jane Jones (which ties in with mother-in-law's name) in 1843 (Clutton 11-108)"
Unfortunately, it looks like someone unrelated, but it would be worth a contact, Richard, to try to find out whether this is your Elizabeth's family.
In 1881, William (born c1823 Chilcompton Somerset) is "labourer".
Well, this would be her in 1871 (she is born Downside in 1861, with siblings born Chilcompton):
Name: Elizabeth Pennell (name is not clear, but could equally be Purnell) Age: 16 Estimated birth year: abt 1855 Relation: Niece Where born: Chilcompton, Somerset, England Civil parish: New Windsor Ecclesiastical parish: St John Town: New Windsor County/Island: Berkshire
Her occupation is Nurse.
Which could bring us to one I'd looked at in 1881:
Name: Eliza Bird Age: 25 Estimated birth year: abt 1856 Relation: Lodger > Occupation: District Nurse Civil parish: Marylebone County/Island: London
but shown as single, place of birth not known.
The only other guess in 1881 was a married lodger in Norfolk, but she turns out to be with her husband.
|
|
Madmeg
|
Report
|
17 Apr 2010 18:10 |
Well, Richard, I've waded through your repeat of what you have previously found and the new information, and Janey's responses. First let me assure you that it is not just Janey who is insisting that the Birmingham jewellers are NOT YOUR FAMILY, I also agree they are not, and I'll bet the other people who've contributed to this thread (and some who haven't done yet) have checked us out, and they too think we are right.
Not only is their son Henry still at home in 1871, he's a jeweller, married twice, no children and is still a jeweller in 1901. He doesn't go anywhere near Bishops Stortford, Lambeth or India. So can we please forget him?
We are wanting a Henry who is born in/near Bishops Stortford who lives in Lambeth and isn't there in 1871. We have found one with a father James who has a manual job on the land, albeit not a groom, that fits in every other way. It's a pity his birth is registered as Thomas Henry - oh, here's his baptism:
England & Wales Christening Records, 1530-1906 about Thomas Henry Bird Name: Thomas Henry Bird Gender: Male Birth Date: abt 1854 Christening Date: 5 Jul 1854 Christening Place: Hockerill, Hertfordshire, England Father's Name: James Bird Mother's Name: Charlotte But there's no Thomas Henry in that area with either a father James or a mother Charlotte - so I reckon he's Henry to his family.
I agree, we've no hard proof of him being YOUR Henry, but he's a much better bet than a jeweller from Birmingham.
I'd suggest getting the death certificate of James Bird, Lambeth Mar 1866, 1d/313 (he's age 47 - perfect), and hope he's become a groom or similar (though it doesn't exclude him if he's not).
|
|
Madmeg
|
Report
|
17 Apr 2010 16:15 |
Ann Bird bothers me a little cos in 1871 she is only 36, in 1881 46, in 1891 56, and in 1901 she's 60. But no real matter, cos she isn't likely Henry's mother.
|
|
Madmeg
|
Report
|
17 Apr 2010 16:08 |
Janey, before I wade through Richard's stuff (trying to be polite!), I don't like the Charlotte death in Sep 1853 Lambeth if we put that with the Henry birth in Dec 1853 Saffron Walden (EDIT, or with the Thomas Henry birth in Bishops Stortford). If we assume the death/birth occurred end September, the quarters are acceptable, but not the places.
I appreciate the family weren't living in Herfordshire, but in 1851 they are at Elsenham, which although is in Essex, the registration district was Bishops Storford, with Saffron Walden next door (and Elsenham between the two).
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
17 Apr 2010 16:00 |
MM, there is indeed an Ann Want in 1851 who's close to Ann Bird in 1861 in details (re the 1858 marriage to a James Bird):
Name: Ann Want Age: 20 Estimated birth year: abt 1831 Relation: Servant Where born: Ware, Hertfordshire, England >> Civil parish: Lambeth Occupation: servant
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
17 Apr 2010 15:17 |
One bit more, re this:
James Bird (occupation labourer) married Charlotte Papworth in 1841 (this I feel is not my ancestor) Their son was a Thomas Henry Bird born (11 years later!) in Colins Cross, Bishop Stortford (from copy of Birth Cert) on 28 Sept. 1853 registered 22nd October 1853 Bishop Stortford Counties Herts & Essex. This definitely means Henry Bird is not theirs as Henry was born 20 July in 1852 from James Bird and Priscilla Adam/s (different parents). His name is also Henry, not Thomas Henry.
Son Henry in the 1861 census is listed as born in Elsenham, Essex. At that time, Elsenham was in Saffron Waldron reg dist (it is located between Bishops Stortford and Saffron Waldron towns).
Births Dec 1853 BIRD Henry Saffron Wn 4a 289
(Obviously, if you have the birth cert for the Thomas Henry Bird reg the same quarter, and the parents are in fact James Bird and Charlotte Papworth, then the two births -- that Thomas Henry and the Henry in Saffron Waldron above -- are mutually exclusive, being in the same quarter, and that can't be the Henry in 1861.)
It would by no means have been unusual for a young man to add a year to his age in order to join the military (in search of employment undoubtedly).
There is no son Thomas (Thomas Henry) in the 1861 census household of the James & Priscilla family (James now married to Ann). If the Thomas Henry birth you refer to was son Henry in that household, then plainly he went by the name Henry, and may not even have known his first name was Thomas.
There IS a son Henry in that 1861 household who has to be accounted for somehow!! Birth, post-1861 records ...
And the absolute irrefutable fact remains that Henry Bird son of James Bird and Priscilla Adams was in the 1871 census in Birmingham when your Henry Bird was in the military, in India:
1871 England Census about Henry Bird Name: Henry Bird Age: 18 Estimated birth year: abt 1853 Relation: Son Father's Name: James Mother's Name: Princella Where born: Birmingham, Warwickshire, England
Civil parish: All Saints County/Island: Warwickshire Registration district: Birmingham
James Bird 43 Princella Bird 43 James Bird 20 Henry Bird 18 Mary Bird 15 William Bird 13 Loura Bird 5 Catherine Bird 3
Richard -- look back at your very first post in this thread.
You had James Bird who married Charlotte Papworth being the same James Bird who married Priscilla Adams, just for starters.
Surely you can see how guessing and assuming and "feeling" have sent you down the wrong track in this search?
What we've been doing is finding *facts*, and what you've been doing is ignoring them!
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
17 Apr 2010 14:53 |
Richard, I'm afraid I have become exasperated to the point of giving up.
You say you have this information:
1828? James Bird - Great Great Grandfather Birmingham 1849 Marries Priscilla Adam on the 12th November, Aston Juxta, UK Birmingham 1851 James Jr. is born Birmingham 1853 Henry is born on the 20th July Birmingham 1856 Mary is born Birmingham 1858 William John is born Birmingham 1866 Laura is born Birmingham 1868 Catherine is born Birmingham 1861 Gold cutter/Jeweller Birmingham 1871 Jeweller Birmingham 1875 Priscilla Adam dies aged 47 Birmingham 1891 When did James Bird die?
It's charming information. It's information about SOMEBODY. We have not the first reason in the world to believe it is information about anybody related to your Henry. We have no reason at all to call this James your great-great-grandfather, and yet you keep doing it.
Your Henry enrolled in the military in Lambeth when he was very young and said he was from Bishops Stortford. What does Birmingham have to do with *anything*??
In fact, we have absolutely irrefutable reasons to say he is definitely NOT your great-great-grandfather.
We KNOW this is NOT your Henry. Because Henry son of James Bird and Priscilla Adams WAS IN THE 1871 CENSUS living with his family in Birmingham -- when your Henry WAS IN INDIA. You have given that info yourself -- that your Henry left for India 183 days after enrolling in July 1870. What is eluding you here??
You say:
"James Bird (occupation labourer) married Charlotte Papworth in 1841 (this I feel is not my ancestor)"
I'm a practitioner of genealogy by psychic flash, indeed. ;) But it is always based on *something*. I have no idea why you "feel" this. None at all.
You say:
"We can now eliminate James and Charlotte as my ancestors do you agree?"
Why would we agree??
This James and his son Henry were living in Lambeth in 1871. Lambeth is where your Henry enrolled in the military at a very young age. This James died when his son Henry was young. This James's son Henry cannot be identified in any records in England, especially censuses, after 1871. This James's wife / Henry's stepmother was born in Hertfordshire. The locations associated with this family are close to Bishops Stortford, where your Henry said he was from, when he enrolled.
-- In fact, on a search for "elsenham essex uk", Google maps returns:
Elsenham Bishop's Stortford, Hertfordshire, UK
Kind of a geographic clincher, I think. Elsenham is on the northeastern outskirts of Bishops Stortford.
So no, I don't think we can eliminate James and Charlotte as your ancestors.
I think they ARE your ancestors.
|
|
Richard
|
Report
|
17 Apr 2010 10:02 |
James Bird (occupation labourer) married Charlotte Papworth in 1841 (this I feel is not my ancestor) Their son was a Thomas Henry Bird born (11 years later!) in Colins Cross, Bishop Stortford (from copy of Birth Cert) on 28 Sept. 1853 registered 22nd October 1853 Bishop Stortford Counties Herts & Essex. This definitely means Henry Bird is not theirs as Henry was born 20 July in 1852 from James Bird and Priscilla Adam/s (different parents). His name is also Henry, not Thomas Henry.
We can now eliminate James and Charlotte as my ancestors do you agree? The James Bird born c1827 (occupation jeweller), must be my ancestor, Married Priscilla Adam/s b1827 in 1849 Their children were, James Junior b1851, Mary b1856, William b1858, Laura b866, Catherine b1868 Henry Bird b1852 (This is the Henry that firstly married Elizabeth Purnell UK and then Annie Ellen Williams India) This Henry is definitely my Great Grandfather, so his father must be the James Bird b1827 from St George Birmingham. It shows the family in the 1861 Census, all from Birmingham. 1871 Census shows them there too. I still would love to know who James Bird’s father and mother were. How do I do this?
|
|
Richard
|
Report
|
17 Apr 2010 09:57 |
Doesn't give an address but it says residence at the time of marriage for Henry Bird was Barracks Woolwich. Ly' Engineer ??? Woolwich. (writing is unclear) They were married in the register office, District of Woolwich, County of Kent.
The witnesses look like A.Walsh and Ada Keens. The Registrar looks like a Richard Ridon.
|
|
Vicci
|
Report
|
17 Apr 2010 03:56 |
are you able to read any of the witness names and the addresses of where they were lving?
|
|
Richard
|
Report
|
17 Apr 2010 03:46 |
GGRAND Father Henry Bird 1853 - 1904 Birmingham
1875 Arrives in the UK on the 2 January Stays in UK for 6 years 1876 Marries Elizabeth Purnell 17th April in Woolwich Woolwich UK Hi Victoria From the copy of the Marriage Cert in 1876 7th April, at the Register Office in Woolwich , County of Kent it states............ Henry Bird's age is 22 his father James deceased. James occupation, groom. Elizabeth Purnell aged 21 father William, occupation labourer (I think) as it's a bit hard to read on the copy. Richard.
|
|
Richard
|
Report
|
17 Apr 2010 03:45 |
GGRAND Father Henry Bird 1853 - 1904 Birmingham
1875 Arrives in the UK on the 2 January Stays in UK for 6 years 1876 Marries Elizabeth Purnell 17th April in Woolwich Woolwich UK
From the copy of the Marriage Cert in 1876 7th April, at the Register Office in Woolwich , County of Kent it states............ Henry Bird's age is 22 his father James deceased. James occupation, groom. Elizabeth Purnell aged 21 father William, occupation labourer (I think) as it's a bit hard to read on the copy. Richard.
|
|
Vicci
|
Report
|
17 Apr 2010 03:42 |
Richard
can you please give all the details from the Henry and Elizabeth Purnell marriage certificate.
thanks
|