Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
birth certificate( new info 3-4-14)
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
martynsue | Report | 14 Apr 2010 21:44 |
i have searched fmp but it says no results also been through every john jones on genes i cannot find a match,any ideas what to try next |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jooleh | Report | 14 Apr 2010 21:10 |
My thoughts exactly - I've looked! Feel that may be a vital missing link. Does anyone know if parts of Oldham may be missing from the 1901 census? |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 14 Apr 2010 19:31 |
where is john on the 1901 census ? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 14 Apr 2010 18:20 |
gene when your grandad gave you bits of info did he ever say if john edward had been married before he met mary |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 14 Apr 2010 18:01 |
i must say it is nice to find a relative that i did not know of, mum will be full of it tomorrow |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
gene1 | Report | 14 Apr 2010 17:40 |
I have found info in my notes of a burial for Thomas Jones buried 20 September 1913 aged 18 months in same grave as John Edward. |
|||
|
gene1 | Report | 14 Apr 2010 15:36 |
Hi all, I have been trying to locate a marriage index for john and mary for a long time but have not been successful. As Mary used many variations of surnames and names it is possible that this may be why. |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 14 Apr 2010 13:28 |
hope you had more luck than me with your cert ann |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 14 Apr 2010 08:07 |
thanks julie |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Jooleh | Report | 13 Apr 2010 23:47 |
Finally found the 1891 census that gene1 posted earlier. Ancestry had them down as 'Tones' -I've corrected it Martyn as if I remember correctly you don't have a sub for Ancestry? FMP has them under the correct name but I don't have a sub for that. |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 13 Apr 2010 21:47 |
well i have been looking through the records all evening & i still cannot find a marriage for john&mary or a birth for joseph |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 13 Apr 2010 17:50 |
neither can i |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 13 Apr 2010 15:59 |
there may have been a joseph in the baptism records but have not written one down. There were one or two baptisms which might have fitted but the names did not seem right so ignored them. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 13 Apr 2010 13:42 |
hi ann |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 13 Apr 2010 13:06 |
pray hard for those certificates cos if you receive yours I should get mine - actually ordered before yours on 31 March |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 13 Apr 2010 12:28 |
hi no cert today this is so annoying saying a prayer that tomorrow will be the day!! |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
martynsue | Report | 13 Apr 2010 09:20 |
i have just sent a pm to gene,will let you know if cert comes today ,i still cannot find norman 1912? |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 13 Apr 2010 04:52 |
If Norman turns out to be Thomas then death index will still be wrong then as it gives birth as Aug.(i know this date is only good if person registering death is 100% sure!) |
|||
|
Jooleh | Report | 13 Apr 2010 00:07 |
I've searched long and hard for Leonard! I was starting to wonder if he was the Thomas who now appears to be Norman Patrick.The different mmn use I can understand but registering a child in one name then completely changing the name at baptism seems really odd.................the mystery continues........... |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 12 Apr 2010 23:53 |
It's nice to know that all that from gene1 now makes sense of the baptism records I found and ties the leicester name in nicely |
|||
Researching: |