Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
chrissiex
|
Report
|
28 Dec 2009 17:54 |
Vivienne I looked into that Albert Henry Fuller you put from 1911 (I think I put his birth details somewhere in this thread, lol) and this is his father in 1881:
Name: Frederick W. Fuller Age: 16 Estimated birth year: abt 1865 Relation: Son Father's Name: William (c1838 Norfolk) Mother's Name: Emma (c1843 Upminster) Gender: Male Where born: Upminster, Essex, England Civil parish: St George County/Island: London
so he doesn't seem to be a grandson of Henry and Eleanor unfortunately.
|
|
BatMansDaughter
|
Report
|
28 Dec 2009 16:14 |
And this marriage;
Surname First name(s) Spouse District Vol Page
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marriages Jun 1936 (>99%) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>Livermore Rosina M McPherson Essex S W 4a 801 >>>>>>>>>>>>McPherson George A Livermore Essex S.W. 4a 801 Peacock Ivy R Vincent Essex S.W. 4a 801 Vincent William R Peacock Essex S.W. 4a 801
Dee x
|
|
BatMansDaughter
|
Report
|
28 Dec 2009 16:12 |
Hya Viv,
Think your right..... they'll be about later. Rich you say George Mcpherson died in ww2, this is from CWGC;
Name: McPHERSON, GEORGE ALFRED Initials: G A Nationality: United Kingdom Rank: Private Regiment/Service: North Staffordshire Regiment Unit Text: 6th Bn. Age: 32 Date of Death: 06/08/1944 Service No: 6481200 Additional information: Son of George and Harriet McPherson; husband of Rosina May McPherson. Casualty Type: Commonwealth War Dead Grave/Memorial Reference: XIX. F. 12. Cemetery: BAYEUX WAR CEMETERY
This would give him a birth year of 1912.
Dee x
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
28 Dec 2009 15:47 |
I think the other lot are night owls Dee !
|
|
BatMansDaughter
|
Report
|
28 Dec 2009 15:37 |
Hi Rich, Bruce, Barbara and Viv,
Hope you've all had a very good Christmas!! Looking for Fred/Franks death;
England & Wales, Death Index: 1916-2005 about Frederick George Fuller Name: Frederick George Fuller Birth Date: 4 Jul 1905 Death Registration Month/Year: 1971 Registration district: Greenwich Inferred County: Greater London Volume: 5b Page: 1183 England & Wales, Death Index: 1916-2005 about George Frederick Fuller Name: George Frederick Fuller Birth Date: 2 Sep 1906 Death Registration Month/Year: 1970 Registration district: Islington Inferred County: Greater London Volume: 5c Page: 1347 England & Wales, Death Index: 1916-2005 about Frederick George Fuller Name: Frederick George Fuller Birth Date: 30 Nov 1904 Death Registration Month/Year: Sep 1987 Age at death (estimated): 82 Registration district: Ealing Inferred County: London Volume: 12 Page: 49 England & Wales, Death Index: 1916-2005 about Frederick George Fuller Name: Frederick George Fuller Birth Date: 16 Nov 1906 Death Registration Month/Year: Apr 1987 Age at death (estimated): 80 Registration district: Waltham Forest Inferred County: London Volume: 15 Page: 733
Do any of these death areas ring a bell Rich?? I've taken the deaths within a year of the year of birth of 1905.
Dee x
|
|
FannyByGaslight
|
Report
|
28 Dec 2009 11:18 |
Is this any help? 1911
ddress: 28 Walpole Road W Stow
FULLER, Frederick William Husband M 46 1865 Smelters Labourer Upminster Essex FULLER, Jane Martha Wife F 45 1866 Housewife Marylebone FULLER, Walter William Son Single M 25 1886 Warehouseman Lambeth FULLER, Alice Maud Daughter Single F 22 1889 Collar Machinist Lambeth FULLER, George Frederick Son Single M 19 1892 Milkman Lambeth FULLER, Emma Florence Daughter Single F 16 1895 Cap Machinist Walthamstow FULLER, Albert Henry Son M 14 1897 Errand Boy Walthamstow FULLER, Grace Jane Daughter F 9 1902 Walthamstow FULLER, Hettie Elsie Daughter F 6 1905 Walthamstow FULLER, Lilian Rose Daughter F 3 1908 Walthamstow FULLER, Mary Minnie Daughter F 3 1908 Walthamstow FULLER, William Ernest Son M 2 1909 Walthamstow
What baptism do you want from Ancestry?
|
|
Rich
|
Report
|
28 Dec 2009 06:15 |
Hello my fellow Insomniac????
Ok I will join ancestry (as also getting vexed at the fact whatever I try on here to find the aforementioned 1901 Fuller/Fallers doesnt work) but can you tell m what membership I'll need to get access to the baptism index? I had a look at the site and cant see that index mentioned.
My aunts are very unhelpful in that they are unaware even of Freds death. They thought it was early 80s but other suspicions say it is late 80s! I can only think of 2 people who may know something- my great aunt (Freds sister in law) who is in her 90s and apparently someone knows where George/Harrietts descendant Rita lives. The rellies are proving predictbly unhelpful in getting their info too!
Ah! chocloate....someone gave us a box of M&S chocs which I had with a glass of single malt (specially bottled for me! never thought that would happen :) Very nice.
Rich
|
|
chrissiex
|
Report
|
28 Dec 2009 03:35 |
There is the baptism index at Ancestry that I don't pay to access that could answer some questions with mother's surname.
Certainly not, giving up yet! It could take a very long time, I have some myself that have taken literally years, but were (almost) solved in the end.
Relentless scouring of the databases _and_ interrogating of aging relations turned out to be both crucial since the scraps of info held by relations turned out to be the key to understanding what was in the records. On the other hand, relations sometimes 'know' fairytales and the databases sometimes just don't reveal their secrets, lol, but give up trying? never. In fact it can be almost anticlimax to solve something, lol, the fun is in the hunt!
Quiet Xmas as it should be, not enough chocolate, but that is easily remedied. There is always more chocolate!
|
|
Rich
|
Report
|
28 Dec 2009 03:12 |
Hi Bruce
I didnt know that about the GRO and mothers surname :(
This means that even if my wild speculations were true we still couldnt prove them? Grrrr! lol
This may never be solved then I guess, although I am unwilling to give up just yet..I cant leave the rellies not knowing if they are Fullers without giving it more time.....
BTW good Xmas?
Rich
|
|
chrissiex
|
Report
|
26 Dec 2009 21:17 |
Have still been on the trail of that Albert H Fuller.
In British Army Pension Records at Ancestry there is an Albert Fuller born 1897 father Frederick William Fuller living at 8 Ickworth Park Road Walthamstow (no Fullers there in 1911). He must be the Albert Henry born 1897 died 1979.
That leaves the possibility that 'ours' is the one who died in WWI.
Just to identify them separately, this is the _other_ Albert H Fuller in 1901.
Name: Albert H Fuller Age: 4 Estimated birth year: abt 1897 Relation: Son Father's Name: Frederick W Mother's Name: Jane M Gender: Male Where born: Walthamstow, Essex, England Civil parish: Walthamstow Frederick W Fuller 36 (lead smelter) Jane M Fuller 35 Walter W Fuller 15 Alice M Fuller 12 George F Fuller 9 Emma F Fuller 6 Albert H Fuller 4
For some reason we can't find the birth of Fred/Frank _or_ the person who seems to be his older brother, Albert H Fuller or find either of them in 1911.
|
|
chrissiex
|
Report
|
26 Dec 2009 20:38 |
Now the big thing you're forgetting Rich is that mother's surname was only included in the birth entry in the GRO index starting in mid-1911 so no birth before that will show any mother's surname. If you strike it really lucky you find a birth with a surname, the mother's or father's, as second given name.
Divorce was really very rare at the time and it is highly unlikely that Harriet was ever divorced from anyone although it is possible. It is more likely that she simply had a child with a man with whom she partnered after Mr Fuller's death, for some shorter or longer time. As you point out there were also births that resulted from events that were involuntary on the mother's part. We tend to chuckle about our ancestors' wantonness, but young women in service for example were not uncommonly victims of exploitation if not outright victimization and many other women were abused or assaulted. It is more likely though that Harriet chose her partner and for one reason or another the situation did not work out, or of course he died.
Now that we know Harriet was a widow by 1901 - and since she was living with her in-laws this does seem credible - it may well be that Mr Fuller was killed in the Anglo-Boer war. So the story about him being killed in the war would be true, it would just be that he was not actually Fred/Frank's father. There is a William Fuller listed in the Imperial Yeomanry here: http://www.britishmedals.us/files/iyf.htm
Fuller, William 23284, Trooper 57th Coy., 15th Bn. I.Y.
|
|
Rich
|
Report
|
26 Dec 2009 09:02 |
None of the possible births for Fred/Frank listed previously give his mothers surname as Fuller or Phillips on freebmd. Does this necessarily mean they are not him?
If they are still possibles then what about this thought:
Did Harriett remarry but it didnt work out and so she THEN called Frank/Fred a Fuller but the new marriages husband was his father?
Still we cant get Fuller/Phillips on freebmd involved with that but we do get:
In 1901 a Mr Foster married a Harriett Fuller. A Frederick Francis Foster was born in W Ham Jun 1905. A very long shot but place/date and those pesky two names are present!
in 1905 there was a marriage in Ipswich between a Harriett Fuller and either an Andrew Pollack Todd or a William Robertson (2 men/2 women on page). There is a 1906 Fred George Robertson birth in Chelsea but also a Fred George Todd born in 1905 W Ham (the latter giving all the right details bar surname)
What if....Harriett meets a man whilst pregant (perhaps the 57 year old Todd) and it was mutually beneficial for them to get hitched. This happens in Ipswich and they come to W Ham immediately after for the birth. This way Fred is born in wedlock. Or, Todd/Robertson is the father and they run away to get married, come back after to have the child. The relationship doesnt work out so Harriett reverts to her widowed name (better a widow than a divorcee she thinks?) and so Fred becomes a Fuller...
None of the childrens births give a result on freebmd for mothers surnames being fuller or phillips but then neither do the previous births to check. If the freebmd would give the right mothers surname then this is all hogwash but if there is a chance it may not have it listed or listed correctly then we have a slim possible. Interestingly enough Mr Todd died in Marylebone in 1909, thus showing he moved in the right direction at some point.
Rich
|
|
Rich
|
Report
|
24 Dec 2009 18:44 |
Hi all
Going back to: why was Fred called Frank? It occurred to me my mum is Frances and all the names in our recent generations are borrowed from the previous two in some combination. So was my grandad Francis? Why the name change to Fred on the marriage cert? I joked with my mum that he must have been on the run...and...she said he was according to nan a petty crim!!!!! I asked if he lied a lot and she confirmed nan had said that too. So has this man been runnign through life changing facts and dates to suit his current purposes?
There is a 1906 West Ham birth for a Francis George Fuller. Could this be him????
Merry Xmas
Rich
|
|
Rich
|
Report
|
23 Dec 2009 21:23 |
Hi Bruce.
I'm waiting for the (not always reliable lol) rellies to give me that info. I'll post it when it arrives.
Rich
|
|
chrissiex
|
Report
|
23 Dec 2009 20:09 |
Do you know about when and where he died Rich? We might be able to identify the death in the index without waiting to see whether someone has the certificate and that could give the birthdate.
|
|
Rich
|
Report
|
23 Dec 2009 18:57 |
lol Bruce..you are so right..with a caveat..which is as long as we find them in the end anyway! lol. I think some of the tentative conclusions we are entertaining aren't being liked by some family members, when I broached the possibles this afternoon. I am waiting for the death cert info and when I have this hopefully we'll know more. I am going to order the birth cert I think might be right as well just in case to save time. Regards Rich
|
|
chrissiex
|
Report
|
23 Dec 2009 16:32 |
Yes for sure Rich I agree with the summing up. And what would we do if we did not have these difficult ancestors? If none of them had any secrets it would be like a paint by numbers but this way we get to mix the paints and paint the picture ourselves, lol.
|
|
Rich
|
Report
|
23 Dec 2009 15:53 |
Thanks Bruce- sideline deleted from my head! lol
Do you agree with my previous summing up post just prior to the sideline?
All the best
Rich
|
|
chrissiex
|
Report
|
23 Dec 2009 15:18 |
Hi Rich. I think both Dee and I are using the Ancestry records which most people consider to be a better deal than Genes. I don't know what database Genes takes you too but you could try searching for example for Albert H with no surname just using his date and place of birth.
For that divorce that fascinates you, lol, this is what I said in the other thread
************
I have found the divorce information at the archives website.
Divorce Court File: 18743. Appellant: Joseph Edwards. Respondent: Harriet Alice Edwards. Co-respondent: William Fuller. Type: Husband's petition for divorce [hd]. . Divorce Court File: 18743. Appellant: Joseph Edwards. Respondent: Harriet Alice Edwards. Date: 1897.
But if that was the Harriet who married George McPherson, she should have given Edwards as her surname, not Fuller.
(Then I put the Phillips Fuller marriage we now assume was the right people. There is no Harriet Edwards William Fuller marriage that would have made that Harriet the one who married McP as Fuller. And that Harriet's father would not have been Joshua Phillips.)
I think this is the marriage of the couple who divorced.
Marriages Sep 1893 (>99%) Croucher Harriett Alice Strood 2a 926 Edwards Joseph Strood 2a 926
************
Strood is in Kent. There just isn't a Phillips in that case. Harriet Croucher married Joseph Edwards and he divorced her for adultery with a William Fuller. They are in the completely wrong place and William Fuller is a common name.
This is that Harriet's birth
Births Mar 1875 Croucher Harriet Alice Maidstone 2a 601
|
|
Rich
|
Report
|
23 Dec 2009 11:38 |
Side Issue: The previous divorce of Edwards and Phillips was mentioned as being unlikely for our search due to its whereabouts but I am not convinced of that. Obviously it doesnt necessarily fit by any means but Harriet couldve moved away with said chap and started an affair with W H on a visit home or perhaps he visited her (if they already knew each other). The (oft wrong) family lore states Harriett was thrice wed. McP, Fuller and one other possibly, from what we now know. The place on the documentation is Strood (cant see county) -but did you see it, Bruce, when you looked? If I am not being daft with this I might hunt for marriage cert to check if Harriets parents are the same. (Of course I dont have a date on the record which could discount it entirely)
|