Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
LadyKira
|
Report
|
15 Dec 2009 12:10 |
And don't you just love the typo above?
|
|
LadyKira
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2009 23:51 |
Stephen Richardson Wood, of High-street, in the' town and county of the town of Nottingham, and of Ilkeston, in the county of Derby, Provision Dealer, having been adjudged bankrupt under a Petition for adjudication of Bankruptcy, filed in Her Majesty's Court of Bankruptcy for the" Birmingham District, on the 19th day of ^ February, 1866, a public sitting, for the said bankrupt to pass his Lust Examination, and make application for his Discharge, will be held before George Williams Sanders, Esq., a Commissioner of the said Court, on the 1st day of May next, at the said Court, at the Shirehall, Nottingham, at eleven o'clock in the forenoon precisely, the day last aforesaid being the day limited for the said bankrupt to surrender. Mr. John Harris, of Lowpavement, Nottingham, is the Official Assignee, and Mr. S. Maples, of Nottingham, and Messrs. James and Griffin, of Birmingham, are the Solicitors acting in the bankruptcy
And fifty does not hurt too much.
|
|
LadyKira
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2009 23:46 |
http://www.geddington.net/vlife.htm
|
|
lainie39
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2009 20:06 |
Meg,
I won't ask a ladies' age - but my most 'devasting' birthday to date wasnt my 40th - but my 30th!!!
I was at home with 2 children [under the age of 5] and I had a real panic, feeling that life was passing me by!!! 40 - by comparison - although a significant 'land mark' age - didnt bother me half as much. The next one will have me reassessing my life though!!
I have to say, though, that the saying 'life begins at 40' is a total lie!!! It may have been relevant years ago, but not now!!!!
|
|
Madmeg
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2009 19:34 |
Elaine, 2 years difference is nothing. I have a "big one" coming up in 2012, but in the meantime I have to keep counting forwards from my birth year.
|
|
lainie39
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2009 19:08 |
Hi Meg,
No - his date of birth [by my reckoning!] is 1839!!! I have no idea where the 1837 came from - maybe they really did lose track of how old they were - I know that I do. I was recently very pleasantly surprised to find out that I was a year younger than I thought I was - and at my age - it is VERY important [touchy age-with a BIG one coming up!!]
|
|
lainie39
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2009 19:04 |
Hi Ladykira,
Yes - that is the correct census entry!! He is mysteriously 2 years older than he should be - and it is recorded that Geddington is in Nottinghamshire not Northamptonshire. Notice that Harriet's place of birth is Harby in Leics and not Colston Bassett Notts!!
This is the last record I can find of either of them [save his withdrawal from the partnership in 1882!]
|
|
Madmeg
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2009 00:45 |
His christeneing on family search is 1839, I have nothing for 1837.
|
|
LadyKira
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2009 00:14 |
1881 census - Address: 102, Caroline St, Nottingham St Mary WOOD, Stephen K Head Married M 44 1837 Timber Merchant Employing 14 Men Geddington Nottinghamshire WOOD, Harriet Wife Married F 42 1839 Harby Leicestershire
|
|
LadyKira
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2009 00:10 |
Freewheel
Richardson is his mothers maiden name.
|
|
LadyKira
|
Report
|
14 Dec 2009 00:05 |
1851 census - household transcription Person: WOOD, Stephen Address: Puddingbag Lane, Kettering WOOD, Isaiah Head Married M 39 1812 Tailor Kettering Northamptonshire WOOD, Rachael Wife Married F 41 1810 Kettering Northamptonshire WOOD, Stephen Son M 11 1840 Scholar Geddington Northamptonshire WOOD, Rhoda Daughter F 10 1841 Scholar Kettering Northamptonshire WOOD, Alice Daughter F 7 1844 Scholar Kettering Northamptonshire WOOD, Alfred Son M 5 1846 Scholar Kettering Northamptonshire
|
|
lainie39
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2009 18:37 |
I must be doing something really stupid - but all I can find on Familysearch is his birth which is recorded as 1837!!!
Where am I going wrong?
Elaine
|
|
lainie39
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2009 17:57 |
Hi Ladykira,
Thanks for your reply!
Unfortunately, none of those 'Woods' fit in!!
I am also sorry to tell you that the East Bridgford 'Richardson's' cannot be connected to my Stephen Wood, as in 1881 Stephen and his wife Harriet are found in the census living on Caroline Street, parish of St Mary's in Nottingham. They have no children, recorded on the census, at this time.
Barbara has very cleverly found Harriet in 1871 [which was a mystery to me!] and I have found them on the 1881 census. It is really what happened to them both after that!!!
I have spent nearly all morning looking for Harriet in the 1891 census - and have had no result. I have already gone through this for Stephen!
Maybe the Martians DID get him!!!
Thank you for your time and your interest!!
Elaine
|
|
LadyKira
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2009 15:16 |
1881 census - household transcription
Address: ?, East Bridgford RICHARDSON, Elizabeth Head Married F 46 1835 Sempstress Colston Basset Nottinghamshire BRADLEY, Richard B Son Single M 17 1864 Ag Lab East Bridgford Nottinghamshire BRADLEY, Frank Son Single M 13 1868 Ag Lab East Bridgford Nottinghamshire RICHARDSON, Walter Son Single M 7 1874 Scholar East Bridgford Nottinghamshire
|
|
LadyKira
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2009 15:13 |
There are other Woods there too. I cannot remember if these fit in.
1871 census - household transcription Address: Village Wood's Farm, Colston Basset WOOD, John Head M 36 1835 Leicestershire WOOD, Elizabeth Wife F 33 1838 Nottinghamshire WOOD, Sarah L Daughter F 10 1861 Nottinghamshire WOOD, David W Son M 7 1864 Nottinghamshire BREEDEN, Jane Servant F 18 1853 Nottinghamshire HENSON, Ann Servant F 18 1853 Nottinghamshire VIEW PLOUGHWRIGHT, James Servant M 16 1855 Nottinghamshire SUMNER, James Servant M 16 1855 Leicestershire
|
|
lainie39
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2009 14:08 |
No - not at all Ginny. I tried to search emigrants on Ancestry, but the records didnt go up to the sort of dates I was looking at. In fact, you reminded my that Familysearch and Ancestry both include US census'. I havent been able to find him on either before now - but then - I have usually been looking at the UK. So having reminded me, I have another avenue to try!!!
I have come to the conclusion that I have four outcomes here;
he died - but I cannot find a death record he changed his name - but this will be difficult to find out he emigrated - ??? I can check as I have said above - or the Martians have taken him!!!! :-) lol
Elaine
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2009 13:47 |
Hi Elaine
I thought the US census was a long shot. Ive deleted it so as not to confuse things.
Keep trying
Ginny x
|
|
lainie39
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2009 10:44 |
Hi Ginny,
Thanks for your reply!
No, Stephen didnt have a brother called Edward - unfortunately - and none of the other names are associated with him. Forenames that are - are Isaiah, Rachel, Alfred, Alice and Rhoda. These are his parents and his siblings. Surnames of immediate family are Wood, Priest, Rouse and Wolfenden.
I was going to say, first of all, that it couldnt be him, as he is recorded on the 1881 census for Nottingham, England - but stranger things have happened.
Thank you so much for looking though.
What I have noticed whilst looking at the originals of each census page that a Stephen Wood [of about the right age] is included on - is the mis-transcribing. Now I know that some of the handwriting or copies of the census are difficult to read - but some of it is way off the mark! Another lesson to learn - not to believe the transcripts - but to check for yourself!
Elaine
|
|
lainie39
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2009 08:35 |
Barbara,
The original 1871 census image says that she is still married!! Another clue!
Elaine
|
|
lainie39
|
Report
|
13 Dec 2009 08:29 |
Hi Barbara,
Your find does help very much, and gives me more food for thought!! I wonder why she went back to her parents? Did they separate? Did he go away for some reason? I will look at this all again.
I dont know how I overlooked her in the 1871 census - maybe I have been concentrating on him too much - sometimes I forget that it also pays to search for other family members. I thought I had but......... well, that is where these boards come into there own!!
Thank you very much for looking for me!!! Your help is much appreciated!
|