Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2010 20:03 |
There's a Charles Coverman in 1911 who looks like ...
COVERMAN CHARLES 1902 9 Bethnal Green London but living with
COVERMAN SAMUEL 1874 37 COVERMAN ANNIE 1876 35 COVERMAN JANE 1900 11 COVERMAN YETTA 1903 8 COVERMAN REUBEN 1906 5 COVERMAN JACK 1908 3
Here's one of the clan:
CAN COEVORDEN RACHAEL 1892 19 Hackney London
There's a batch of VAN COEVERDENs in Poplar and COEVORDENs in Whitechapel and Hackney with VAN given as part of the first name. Also VAN COEVORDENs in Hackney (MANNS is undoubtedly Morris, e.g.)
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2010 19:58 |
So it turns out you may just be related to our Olympic athlete after all!
Now back to page 1, I'd proposed this birth:
Births Mar 1902 Covands Charles A S W. Ashford 2a 860
but that was after Alexander and Hannah married different people.
Will someone refresh my memory - we're still looking for Charles's birth??
|
|
jansmith
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2010 19:50 |
have added place of birth to 1861 all Holland until Alex
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2010 19:45 |
1881 searching for
surname COEV*
with nothing else, there's a batch of Van Coevorden-s in St Leonard, but no Alex*.
Names Solomon and Morris, from the Netherlands, my guess is Jewish.
Might Alexander have been an adopted name?
|
|
jansmith
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2010 19:42 |
1861 Name: Alexander Van Coevorden Age: 8 Estimated birth year: abt 1853 Relation: Son Father's Name: Thomas Mother's Name: Esther Gender: Male Where born: London, England Civil parish: St Botolph Without Bishopsgate County/Island: Middlesex Country: England
Household Members: Name Age Thomas Van Coevorden 53 holland Esther Van Coevorden 37 holland Soloman Van Coevorden 16holland Maurice Van Coevorden 14 Flora Van Coevorden 13 John Van Coevorden 11 holland Alexander Van Coevorden 8 london Mary Ann Van Coevorden 2 london Rosa Van Coevorden 4 Mo london
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2010 19:39 |
Oh duh, search for him rather than her.
If he married in 1900, while she was living, and she married in 1901, then they were definitely not married to each other ever, and you can stop looking. ;)
1901
Name: Alexander Vancoevorden Age: 49 Estimated birth year: abt 1852 Relation: Head Spouse's name: Sarah Gender: Male Where born: Whitechapel, London, England Civil parish: Mile End Old Town
no kids with.
|
|
Florence61
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2010 19:26 |
jansmith, thanks for that i must be thick, i never knew how to find out the info but i do now. i have checked all the hannah pitchers and nothing came up.
but i then typed in marriages for alexander van coevorden(as spelt on sophies cert) and lo and behold it came up. mar 1900 but sadly not to hannah. however i then searched for a birth and ther is a birth for alexander jfm 1853 in whitechapel 1c 377 now going to search the census to see what i can find.
thanks janey, i know youre a busy lady. back soon
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2010 19:02 |
I'm trying to bang out some overdue work - but I did spend some time looking for them in 81 and 91 with all sorts of possibilities for names (and including Harry who might have been born by 1891) but to absolutely no avail.
Flo, follow Jan's directions for seeing the other spouses in a list. Before 1911 you can't tell who married whom if there are more than two names in the list, but you can always check around for both of them. If you find one of the grooms obviously married to one of the brides in the next census, then you can assume the other two married each other. ;)
|
|
jansmith
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2010 18:53 |
Hi do you search for marriage info on http://freebmd.rootsweb.com
which gives this Marriages Sep 1885 (>99%) Pitcher Hannah Holbeach 7a 591
if you click on the page number i.e 591 it will then give the names of others on that page in this case just the 2 of them but sometimes it will give 4 or more names which is ok if you know both names you are looking for Marriages Sep 1885 (>99%) Pitcher Hannah Holbeach 7a 591 Wing John Elkanah Holbeach 7a 591
|
|
Florence61
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2010 18:36 |
well peeps ive found this SEP1885 hannah pitcher marriage holbeach 7a 591 MAR1883 hannah maria hartismere 4a 783 JUN1881 hannah jane pitcher eastbourne sx 2b 133 can anyone check these for me please thanks
|
|
Florence61
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2010 18:28 |
janey ive just had a thought. sophia pritchard you found back in nov and then couldnt locate in 1881. well what if her name was really pitcher spelt wrong and then when the census was done in 1881 it was mispelt again. her mother hannah was illiterate that we know, so wasnt traced as pritchard.
however 2nd thoughts if hannah was unmarried when sophie was born around 1880/1 she would have taken her mothers name pitcher/pritchard.in 1901 sophie shows as van covenden(her fathers) name. her mother is hannah syrett because she has already remarried before the census took place.so maybe the marriage to alexander took place between 1880 and 1890. i am going to have another look on bmd and see what i can find.
|
|
Florence61
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2010 18:18 |
hi janey and lyndsey, thanks for getting back. oh lyndsey what a shame and i was so hoping it would be one of them. never mind ill keep searching.
janey on hannahs marr cert the fathers name is very clearly john pitcher and the details you have are what i found also.
its the fact thats it shows on her marriage to henry a widow.as i said before sophies fathers spelling of his name is just awful.i sometimes wonder if i would have had more chance if it was smith lol!!!
if i could trace sophies birth details i could order a cert but ive tried without success due to the spelling of her name and believe me i have just about tried every combination for the van.vain,pain/covenden/covaiodon/covoerdon etc and now not sure whats left to find. any suggestuions ladies or anyone else for that matter. thanks.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2010 17:17 |
I'm going to come back when I have proper time. Just one thing.
Her name may well have been Pritchard, and it got entered wrong on that certificate. If she didn't know how to spell it (a lot of people weren't literate at all), the registrar might have just written it as heard. She herself might even have thought it was Pitcher. Easier to say, after all. ;)
Pitcher looks right, though.
1871 in Ramsgate
John Pitcher 53 Eliza Pitcher 54 Hannah Pitcher 14 Frederick Pitcher 12
1861 in Ramsgate:
John Pitcher 45 Eliza Pitcher 46 Marthiena Pitcher 18 Eliza Pitcher 17 John Pitcher 16 Martha Pitcher 12 Ann Pitcher 7 = Hannah Fredk Pitcher 4
|
|
Lindsey*
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2010 17:14 |
Just one problem, none of the marriages are to an Alexander ?
|
|
Florence61
|
Report
|
24 Apr 2010 16:35 |
hi there, yes its been a while but finally i got those important certificates.on sophies marriage cert it names her father. alexander van coveandon/sailor. yes the spelling is different once again!
on her mothers marriage cert it gives herself as widow and surname as vain covaiondon(hannah). this is 1901 when she married henry syrett.
it also gives hannahs father as john pitcher/boatman,fisherman. my aunt always said her name was pritchard, similar i guess. i traced hannah, brother frederick and her parents john and eliza on the 1871 census.
so as hanah was born around 1855 and sophie was born in 1883 hannah must have married roughly between 1874 and say 1881 to alexander.
i have checked on free bmd and ther are at least 3 hannah pitchers married around 1876/77. i am not a member on there so if any one would be able to tell me which hannah married alexander so i can order the cert i would be extremely grateful
i have kept this request with the original thread as all the info is here if anyone new is reading this. janey and lyndsey did a lot of groundwork in the beginning so im sure will be interested in what i discovered from the certs.
more interesting is that sophies dad was a sailor, but where did here come from here or away?
anyway i would be grateful to anyone who can help once again. thanks. florence formerley known as christina
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
9 Nov 2009 23:47 |
Christina ... read my post above stamped 23:27.
It explains the entire process for searching the 1911 without paying.
And I explained that you can only see images with a subscription. People who do have subscriptions are limited to a certain number of images a day on average.
I'm not sure where Mary Eliza came in here -- May Amelia shows in 1911 (if that is her) as born in 1894 because she hadn't had her birthday yet that year.
Ah. You'd missed the 1911 explanation first time around - crossed in the post. ;)
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
9 Nov 2009 23:28 |
Oh, and never pay for that gold business at this site. Bad deal. Investigate Ancestry, or FindMyPast.
The 1911 is a separate thing for everyone -- no other subscription anywhere includes it. Anyone who does a lookup for you has paid for the 1911 specifically.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
9 Nov 2009 23:27 |
http://www.1911census.co.uk/search/tnaform.aspx
Click "Show advanced fields" down at the bottom.
Expecting mistranscriptions, I searched for
first name MAY last name *starts with* SY born 1893 +/- 2 years.
I think it was a longish list. I just read through it, and hit May Amelia Synett (I didn't know whether she would have her middle name in the census so searched as broadly as possible).
I then searched for any other Synett living in Mile End Old Town *with* May Amelia Synett.
I also searched for any
last name *A* - check "Wildcard name"
living with May Amelia Synett in Mile End Old Town. And then any *E*, any *I*, any *O*, any *U* (a recent thread by Jonesey gives this tip for finding any surname living with someone).
Those were the results. You might be able to tell from the original image whether it really says SYRETT.
If you edit your subject line here to say
1911 image lookup please - see page 2
someone with a subscription will probably show up to check it for you.
|
|
Florence61
|
Report
|
9 Nov 2009 23:23 |
i am already a paid up gold member of gr so dont really want to sign up to another site which will cost me another £40 or so.
|
|
Florence61
|
Report
|
9 Nov 2009 23:20 |
hi guys, sorry for any confusion here. yes i am ordering certs to hopefully clarify a few details.
the reason for asking today about may amelia syrett, who was a daughter of hannah is because, i was talking to an aunt of mine who remembered an aunty may who had 8 children.
it would have been her great aunt anyway. i wanted to see where she was living and with whom in 1911 to see if she was married or had any children.
are you members of the 1911 census or can anyone get lookups for free. if so can you enlighten me please.
i am
|