Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
lancashireAnn
|
Report
|
2 May 2009 18:41 |
mmmm - I had noticed a few!
sorry misled you there - Elizabeth was his grandmother married to a John. William not at home on 1851 census. Mother was Martha but there are several marriages which might fit. Have got the census returns but he did not have any siblings (pity) which might have helped. They even lived in the same place for 20 years (51/61/71 census) & he was married from there in 1872. You'd think I could find them wouldn't you with that info.
|
|
Derek
|
Report
|
1 May 2009 23:17 |
Ann..you'll be delighted to know there were over 100 John Jones born in liverpool in 1853!!..but worry not..all i have to do is find a William and Elizabeth on the 1861 census!!....I'll get back to you......eventually!!
Good fun is this!
Derek
|
|
lancashireAnn
|
Report
|
1 May 2009 22:54 |
12 August 1853 - the only year missing from St Nicholas Liverpool baptisms & no birth reg that I can find. Got everything after that as we have his family bible so even have his exact birth but he did not record his parents. Actually you've set me thinking - I don't think I have sent for any certificates for qtr4 - might be worth a try.
|
|
Derek
|
Report
|
1 May 2009 22:49 |
Hi Ann.....any chance of an approximate date for John Jones?? I'll have a go at anything!!
Derek
|
|
lancashireAnn
|
Report
|
1 May 2009 22:46 |
I've resorted to the chocolate bar and coffee. Why did people have to invent fathers, it just complicates things for their descendants!
When you have sorted out the Bambers & Gregsons (nice to know how they fitted together) would you like a go at my John Jones b Liverpool parents Wm & Elizabeth, inconsiderately no unusual middle names or William Miller father of John, son of John deceased by 1849. No imagination this family - they were all called John, William or William John with few siblings.
|
|
Derek
|
Report
|
1 May 2009 22:05 |
Hi Ann....its flan baked potato and sweetcorn right now!!.........and i'll never sort opiut the Gregsons!!.Just by way of a bit chat..my mother was a gregson..the daughter of an unmarried Ellen Gregson....where do we go from there!!.............I spent months lookng for a david james Gregson (soldier deceased!! haha)..he never existed! Then my sister remembered a little card in my mother's prayer book..mum's dea by the way.....with love and gratitude to James Gregson and Mary Hannah Gregson Well i knew that James, my gt grandfather was married to isabella maguire........so who was this Mary Hannah????
So the lateral thinking came in...did Isabella die and James remarry Mary hannah???????? YES HE DID!!
and Mary hannah Bennett was the daughter of Ann Bamber and Edward Hugh Bennett!!
what fun!!
so now you know!!
Derek.
|
|
lancashireAnn
|
Report
|
1 May 2009 21:21 |
don't drink TOO much scotch or you will never sort out the Gregsons! we even have a few of those in our village just outside Preston. If you do want any look ups doing just let me know. My lot are at the boring stage at the moment so I keep flitting around with other things.
|
|
Derek
|
Report
|
1 May 2009 21:14 |
Hi Ann..you're very kind..and i like you humour about prison visits....maybe its a new line of enquiry to see what yet another!! of my ancestors was in the nick for!!
You might know i have two very successful derbyshire threads..so if you need any help in that area just yell.
Hey..talking of too many Bambers..you want to help me with Gregsons???? preston is and always has been only the greatest hotspot of Gregsons in the world...my mother's name!!.....ans she was illegitimate..can fel another large Scotch coming up!!
Derek
|
|
lancashireAnn
|
Report
|
1 May 2009 20:49 |
there are just too many Bambers in Preston!!!
I found quite a few of various parentage in St John's alone but there are several churches (St george's is only down the road from St John's) & I did not have time to look at the others to see if I could find another Ann with father James.
curiosity - what was Edward in the nick for?
If you are still searching next time I go to the CRO I will have another look. Not sure when I will go next - a lot depends on the weather at this time of year - today we have had a band of rain so the CRO was as good a place to be as any.
the other problem is that if the census returns for Shuttle St in 1871 (see note with 1881 census above) are missing you may never find Ann on the 1871 census. I do know there were one or 2 areas which are not available of Preston.
edit - I have just looked at the street map and that area is definitely missing. I was looking for an address in the road that crosses it recently and that was not there either - it is just behind the prison so close for visiting!
|
|
Derek
|
Report
|
1 May 2009 20:14 |
Hi lancahireAnn....thanks for all your work.....I am quite happy qith Edward H Bennett's story..and his parentage.......Mary H Bennett is a staple part of my Mother's line.Have got all that...........including Edwards time in the nick!!
I am aware that Ann nad Nancy are often interchangeable......but "Often" doesn't give us any certainty.. I have a similar preoblem elsewhere with Ann and Hannah
There are two different 1871 census entries for Ann Bamber as a neice....one of HOOL..and one of NATER..thst could of courswe be SLATER..or even Staley
I have the lancashire BMD's and if i accept IGI's view that Ann was christened 21.09.1851..she would indeed have been 20 still when she married in 1872
There are two Ann bamber's christened St.John Preston in 1851..one with mmn Hool..and one with mmn Richardson.
On the marriage cert for Ann and Edward he is a machinist...late father;s occupation Cork Cutter.born out by 1861 Census....
James Bamber father of Ann is elusive..abd wherever i find him he doesn't fit anything.Perhaps the cert is wrong?
Jeez i need a large Scotch.
Thanks agin
Derek
|
|
lancashireAnn
|
Report
|
1 May 2009 18:13 |
1881?????
Edward H. BENNETT Household Male Other Information: Birth Year Birthplace Preston, Lancashire, England Age 31 Occupation Printers Labourer Marital Status M Head of Household Joseph GOODEIR Relation Prisoner Disability Source Information: Institution "Her Majestys Prison" Preston Lancaster Census Place Preston, Lancashire, England Family History Library Film 1342012 Public Records Office Reference RG11 Piece / Folio 4231 / 97 Page Number 17
|
|
lancashireAnn
|
Report
|
1 May 2009 18:06 |
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1872 BENNETT Mary Hannah Preston mmn = BAMBER
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1874 BENNETT Alice Preston mmn = BAMBER
|
|
lancashireAnn
|
Report
|
1 May 2009 18:02 |
just found this one in 1881
Nancy BENNETT Head M Female 29 Preston, Lancashire, England Cotton Rover Mary Hannah BENNETT Daur Female 8 Preston, Lancashire, England Scholar Alice BENNETT Daur Female 7 Preston, Lancashire, England Scholar
Source Information: Dwelling 6 Shuttle St Census Place Preston, Lancashire, England Family History Library Film 1342012 Public Records Office Reference RG11 Piece / Folio 4231 / 7 Page Number 8
On Ann's marriage she is described as a rover and her address was Shuttle st (for which there is a note in Preston that the 1871 census originals are missing!)
Ann & nancy are often interchangable names
|
|
lancashireAnn
|
Report
|
1 May 2009 17:57 |
if Ann's marriage certificate says her father is James - a spinner then she presumably is not the Ann who is the daughter of William & Rebecca (baptism 21-9-1851 when William is described as a wool comber).
Have you got Ann & Edward in later censuses to prove her age - it has been known for people to give the wrong age on a marriage certificate.
|
|
Derek
|
Report
|
1 May 2009 17:47 |
Hi everybody..am immensely grateful for all your efforts....briliant.. BUT....I am now very confused.....Mary COULD have been the sister of Ann...and it begins to look as though James Bamber was NOT married to a Mary..the Slaters confuse me...
Can we try another tack???? It's me who believes my Tree is wrong, because I thought Mary bamber witness was Ann's mother......clearly not so.......
Thus..can anyone confirm (or deny) that my Tree is correct after all. Trouble is that it does not show a sister Mary for Ann
Here's whats on my tree:
William Bamber (b 1826) married Rebecca Hoole c1848..children ..Joseph 1849..Ann 1852..William 1854..no Mary
and the Jane Hoole mentioned on previous posting had GOT tp be relative.
Any comments gratefully received
Derek
|
|
lancashireAnn
|
Report
|
29 Apr 2009 22:51 |
the other names up to the Leyland births which could be a different family fit with the names on Julie's 1851 & 1841 census. Could your Ann have been registered as Nancy, the 2 were often interchangable or have we got the wrong family completely.
|
|
Catherine
|
Report
|
29 Apr 2009 17:14 |
That's look interesting, but problem:- The Ann Bamber that we are looking for was born in 1852 not 1862 ?
|
|
lancashireAnn
|
Report
|
29 Apr 2009 16:10 |
sorry Derek- was concentrating on Catherine's entry and missed Julie's. Howvever I think Catherine was likely to be right with the marraige of James & Bamber & Nancy Green rather than Nancy Preston. Lancashire bmd site usually gives mmn for children born in Preston & I found these all with mmn = Green
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1838 BAMBER Elizabeth Walton-le-Dale
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1840 BAMBER Benjamin Preston
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1841 BAMBER Benjamin Preston
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1842 BAMBER Alice Preston
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1845 BAMBER Jane Preston
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1847 BAMBER James Preston
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1849 BAMBER Mary Preston
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1851 BAMBER Nancy Preston
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1853 BAMBER James Preston
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1862 BAMBER Ann Leyland
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1863 BAMBER William Leyland
Lancashire Birth indexes for the years: 1865 BAMBER Edward Leyland
the names fit better that those with mmn = Preston
site name lancashirebmd.org.uk
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
29 Apr 2009 09:42 |
You say earlier: "have found Ann daughter of James and mary (1861 Census) but born Salford..........which i quite fancy........BUT "
If it helps you to eliminate - this is the marriage of the James + Mary with the daughter Ann born in Salford:
Lancashire Marriage indexes for the years: 1841 (From LancsBMD site)
Surname Forename(s) Surname Forename(s) Church / Register Office Registers At Reference BAMBER * James EYRE Mary Manchester Collegiate Church (later Manchester Cathedral) Manchester CATH/23/79 BAMBER * James HUNSTONE Mary Manchester Collegiate Church (later Manchester Cathedral) Manchester CATH/23/79
* Mary was born EYRE, married a HUNSTONE, then James Bamber !!
Dea x
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
29 Apr 2009 09:11 |
This could be James + Nancy's marriage?
Marriage: 4 Apr 1836 St Andrew, Leyland, Lancashire, England James Bamber - Bachelor of Whittle le Woods in this parish Nancy Preston - (X), Spinster of Whittle le Woods in this parish Witness: Richard Preston; Alice Waddington, (X) Married by Banns by: Gardner Baldwin Vicar Register: Marriages 1834 - 1837, Page 88, Entry 263 Source: LDS Film 93953
Dea x
|