Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
8 Feb 2009 22:44 |
James Penfold from Ditchling is living with a Bish couple in Cuckfield in 1901:
Edward Bish 43 Naomi Bish 41 James Penfold 16
This could be an interesting Bish household in 1901 in Cliffe, Lewes district:
Frank Bish 41 Millie Bish 41 Edith Bish 19 George Bish 16 Daisey Bish 12 (Elizabeth Daisy, Mar 1889) > Grace Bish 10 Albert Bish 8 > Annie Bish 6 Frederick Bish 4 Stanley Bish 1
Births Dec 1895 Bish Annie Amelia Lewes 2b 171
She has a sister named Grace Ethel. The household is together in 1911, although I can't find Grace, who married in 1915.
The household is mistranscribed as Birks in 1891. In 1881 he is called Frederick and the couple has a newborn Frank.
I cannot for the life of me find a marriage for that couple, or figure out who Millie was. She could have been Milla Roberts born 1857.
If Minnie was a nickname ...
You know, I'm still curious about Amelia Mary A Flower born 1907, and whom she was living with in 1911. She is the only Flower in Newhaven who is not in the household of Frederick & Rose Ann (they have two young daughters), and she was born immediately before their marriage.
... but guessing once again that there might be a John in the household:
HOUSEHOLD KINGSHOTT JOHN M 1874 37 Newhaven Sussex
gets us:
KINGSHOTT BERTIE M 1895 16 Newhaven Sussex KINGSHOTT ELIZABETH M F 1874 37 Newhaven Sussex KINGSHOTT ROSEMARY F 1909 2 Newhaven Sussex
That's who Amelia Mary A Flower was living with.
In 1901 in Newhaven:
John Kingshett 27 Elizabeth M Kingshett 28 Bertie Kingshett 6
Marriages Jun 1894 Blackman Elizabeth Ann Lewes 2b 339 > Janeway Elizabeth Mary Lewes 2b 339 Kingshott John Lewes 2b 339
Frederick Flower married Rose Ann Janeway. Elizabeth Mary Janeway Kingshott would be the sister of Frederick Flower's wife. If Amelia Mary A Flower is the daughter of Frederick Flower and Rose Ann Janeway, why is she with Rose Ann's sister in 1911?
What I'm getting at -- I hope obviously ;) -- is that the apparently unmarried mother of Amelia Mary A Flower could have been somebody with a similar name herself ... like Minnie (Mary) Amelia ...
Of course, she could have been the daughter of Frederick and Rose Ann, and given up before they married.
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
8 Feb 2009 21:14 |
1901
>> Name: M A S Knight Age: 8 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1893 Relation: Boarder Gender: Female Where born: Strood, Kent, England Civil Parish: Newhaven County/Island: Sussex
Thomas Ince 54 - head, widower, stevedore (dock) Fanny Knight 34 - servant, married, housekeeper, born Newhaven M A S Knight 8 - boarder, school girl Frederick Flower 28 - boarder, marine stoker, born Newhaven (no marital status given)
I found tihs household because I found this person in 1911 (found on a search for Amelia in Newhaven):
FLOWER AMELIA M A F 1907 4 Newhaven Sussex
What I can't tell is who is living with her.
But then I looked for Flower in Newhaven in 1901, and found the household as above, with the Knights.
These are who are living with Frederick Flower:
FLOWER ELIZABETH ROSE F 1909 2 Newhaven Sussex HOUSEHOLD FLOWER ROSE ANN F 1880 31 Newhaven Sussex
Frederick married Rose Ann Janeway 1905.
Births Sep 1906 Flower Amelia Mary A Newhaven 2b 175
Aaaaargh. My theory looked so good, but M A S Knight is:
Births Sep 1892 Knight Mary Ann S Strood 2a 565
1911:
KNIGHT MARY ANN SARAH F 1892 19 Newhaven Sussex KNIGHT FANNY F 1866 45 Newhaven Sussex
But -- no stone unturned! When there is much work to be done and deadlines long passed. ;)
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
8 Feb 2009 20:55 |
Births Dec 1887 Akehurst Minnie Jenner Paddington 1a 67
Nope.
In London with parents John and Hannah in 1891 and 1901. No marriage to match, though. Hannah, presumably Jenner, was born in Essex; John was born in Burwash, Sussex. Minnie is with them in Fulham in 1911.
In 1911 there is this household:
PENFOLD GLADYS MARY F 1910 9 MONTHS Lewes Sussex PENFOLD JAMES M 1885 26 Lewes Sussex
No other Penfolds in the household. No Minnie or Amelia or Jenner in the household.
Births Jun 1885 Penfold James Samuel Lewes 2b 189
Births Sep 1910 PENFOLD Gladys [M_] Lewes 2b 147
Look who else was born around the same time as that James, though:
Births Dec 1885 Penfold Harry Lewes 2b 211
Henry ... Harry ...
No marriage or death for either James or Harry that is an obvious match.
In 1901 Harry Penfold is in Newhaven, Lewes district, with parents James and ?Asenath.
And this looks like James Penfold in 1901:
Name: James Penfold Age: 16 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1885 Relation: Servant Where born: Ditchling, Sussex, England Town: Cuckfield
Edward Bish 43 Naomi Bish 41 James Penfold 16
Harry in 1911, still with his parents:
PENFOLD HARRY M 1886 25 Newhaven Sussex
I might peg him as a good candidate for the father. There was a Minnie Driver in Newhaven in 1911. ;)
Someone else who might have been called Minnie ...
Births Jun 1885 Richards Amelia Mary Lewes 2b 190
In 1901 her name is mistranscribed:
Name: Amelia M Richardson - general servant (domestic) Age: 16 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1885 Relation: Servant Gender: Female Where born: Hamsey, Sussex, England Civil Parish: Hamsey address: Hamsey Place
John Kenward 51 - farmer Julia Kenward 57 Annie J Kenward 22 Christena Kenward 20 Florence M Kenward 19 Mary Bannister 71 Amelia M Richardson 16
Her father William is an ag lab in 1891 (mother is Harriet), on Common Lane, Hamsey, and the William & Sophia Jenner household is on the same page that year ...
To finish with a flourish -- here's one to consider, in 1901.
Name: Mennie Tenner [Minnie Jenner] - corrected by an Ancestry user (I was searching for Tenner as mistranscription) Age: 7 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1894 Relation: Daughter Father's Name: Joseph Mother's Name: Alice Gender: Female Where born: Lingfield, Surrey, England Civil Parish: Lingfield Ecclesiastical parish: St Peter and St Paul County/Island: Surrey
Joseph Tenner 37 - bricklayer, born Tonbridge, Kent Alice Tenner 37 - born Lingfield, Surrey Mennie Tenner 7 Susannah Amelia Tenner 6 Alice Muriel Tenner 2 Joseph Edward Tenner 2 Edward Hudson 74 - father in law
The youngest children were twins:
Births Sep 1898 Jenner Alice Muriel Godstone 2a 209 Jenner Joseph Edward Godstone 2a 209
Marriages Mar 1893 Edwards John E. Grinstead 2b 191 Hooper Florence Fanny E. Grinstead 2b 191 > Hudson Alice E. Grinstead 2b 191 > Jenner Joseph E. Grinstead 2b 191
Here are the older girls:
Births Sep 1893 Jenner Minnie E. Grinstead 2b 145
Births Mar 1895 Jenner Susanna Amelia E. Grinstead 2b 146
Coincidental middle name for that second one. Did Minnie always wish she had one? ;) (My grandmother born 1901 did!)
1911 household:
JENNER ALICE F 1864 47 Godstone Surrey JENNER JOSEPH M 1864 47 Godstone Surrey JENNER JOSEPH EDWARD M 1899 12 Godstone Surrey JENNER SUSANNAH AMELIA F 1895 16 Godstone Surrey
No Minnie.
Susannah married 1930, to Jupp. Minnie married 1922:
Marriages Jun 1922 Jenner Minnie Godbold Godstone 2a 518
Aha, Minnie in 1911, but I don't know who else was in the household; probably a domestic servant:
JENNER MINNIE F 1894 17 Godstone Surrey
So I took a guess there might be a John in the household, and there was.
SWINDLEY JOHN EDWARD M 1831 80 Godstone Surrey
Don't know who else, though.
Joseph Jenner in 1871 in Tonbridge:
Edward Jenner 51 > Amelia Jenner 50 Edward Jenner 20 William Jenner 18 George Jenner 17 Susanna Max Jenner 15 Henry Jenner 13 Alfred Jenner 10 - in Lewes district in 1901 Joseph Jenner 7 Arthur Jenner 5 Mary Jane Overton 4 Walter Glyde 33
Loads of Jenners in Sussex in 1901 were born in Kent (this Minnie's father was born in Tonbridge).
Could this Minnie Jenner from Lingfield have been staying with family in Hamsey after the 1911 census? They're pretty close, geographically -- about 20 miles as the crow files.
Okay, I'm obsessed. But hold on, I have a newer better theory.
|
|
Vickier
|
Report
|
8 Feb 2009 20:38 |
1911 This Minnie is living with her family in Devonshire, so no joy there. Worth looking.
|
|
Vickier
|
Report
|
8 Feb 2009 20:03 |
A thought from the information below. Amelia Sarah was working in Croydon in 1891 census. Minnie Amelia was born in St Thomas (I'm presuming London) This could tie the together. I wish Minnie appeared in 1901 census with Amelia Sarah. I know the name Sarah appears later in the family. Minnie's daugter Ellen called her daughter Sarah.
Births Sep 1894 Baker Minnie Amelia St. Thomas 5b 45
1891 census Name: Amelia Sarah Baker Age: 19 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1872 Where born: Ditchling, Sussex, England
Civil Parish: [Penge] Ecclesiastical parish: St Pauls Town: Penge County/Island: London Registration district: Croydon
|
|
Vickier
|
Report
|
8 Feb 2009 19:12 |
Thank you so much for all the info. I am going to sieve through the information, and see if I can take it further. Obviously I will keep you up to date. Vicki
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
8 Feb 2009 17:53 |
I said that a while back, Susan *and* mgnv. ;)
And that this would be the conclusive evidence that her mother was not married.
|
|
mgnv
|
Report
|
8 Feb 2009 13:21 |
Ellen is prob registered under two names - both names are on same page at any rate
Births Sep 1913 (>99%) Barnett Edward J Prevett Lewes 2b 285 Hemsley Vera N Peters Lewes 2b 285 Jenner Ellen G Jenner Lewes 2b 285 Penfold Ellen G Jenner Lewes 2b 285 Tanswell Edith E Brown Lewes 2b 285 THOMAS Mary A L Fermor Lewes 2b 285
|
|
Susan
|
Report
|
8 Feb 2009 09:49 |
View Record
Preview Name: Ellen G Jenner Year of Registration: 1913 Quarter of Registration: Jul-Aug-Sep Mother's Maiden Name: Jenner District: Lewes County: Sussex, East Sussex
See more Ellen G Jenner 1913 Jul-Aug-Sep Lewes Sussex, East Sussex View Record Ellen G Penfold 1913 Jul-Aug-Sep Lewes Sussex, East Sussex
Just looking at this one Ellen is reg in the name of Jenner and Penfold that tells to me that the parents were not marr. Taken from Ancestrys birth indexes. Hope it helps .Sue
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
8 Feb 2009 05:33 |
Okay, one more theory. ;)
Searching for Minnie in Hamsey in 1911:
CORNWELL MINNIE F 1888 23 Lewes Sussex CORNWELL ELIZABETH F 1911 2 MONTHS Lewes Sussex CORNWELL JACOB M 1887 24 Lewes Sussex CORNWELL JACOB M 1910 1 Lewes Sussex
Births Mar 1911 Cornwell Elizabeth M J Lewes 2b 144
Note the J as daughter Elizabeth's third initial. Child of an unmarried mother, given the father's surname, with the mother's surname as a given name?
Jacob Cornwell and Minnie were not married. No marriage, at least at FreeBMD.
Son Jacob Jr. does not seem to have been born Cornwell. He doesn't actually seem to have been born at all, at least not in Lewes, per FreeBMD. No Jacob, first or second name, in the time period. Except:
Births Dec 1904 Cavegn Jacob Lewes 2b 154
Cavegn?? Wrong age, anyhow. Unless the 1911 is off.
Jacob Cornwell's household in 1901:
Jacob Cornwell 39 Elizabeth Cornwell 39 Jacob Cornwell 15 Albert Cornwell 12 Rosy Cornwell 10 Winnie Cornwell 9 (Winifred Ruth Cornwall, 1892) William Cornwell 7 Louisa Cornwell 5 Ernest Cornwell 3 Charley Cornwell 1 (half of the children are registered as Cornwall)
In 1881, father Jacob, as Cornwall, is a general labourer in the workhouse in Cliffe, Lewes district. I haven't checked the later census images.
Who is this Minnie Cornwell in 1911?
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
8 Feb 2009 05:01 |
And shooting my theory down in flames ... 1901:
Name: Minnis Baker Age: 8 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1893 Relation: Daughter Mother's Name: Elizabeth Gender: Female Where born: Lewes, Sussex, England Civil Parish: St Anne Ecclesiastical parish: Lewes St Peter and St Mary County/Island: Sussex
Hey. It was a good one. But I think that kills it. Have to think ...
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
8 Feb 2009 04:04 |
Six people here at GR have Constance Jenner born 1899 in Cuckfield in their trees. Two of them and one other have Amelia Baker born in Ditchling1874-75 (inaccurate dates taken from censuses, if I've picked the right one).
They also have, among them, seven other Jenners born in Cuckfield 1901-1911.
That could yield some answers regarding my theory. ;)
Found Donald Jenner 1903 in Cuckfield in the 1911 census. In the household with him are:
JENNER AMELIA F 1874 37 Cuckfield Sussex JENNER CONSTANCE F 1900 11 Cuckfield Sussex JENNER CYRIL M 1908 3 Cuckfield Sussex JENNER DOROTHY F 1910 1 Cuckfield Sussex JENNER GEORGE M 1905 6 Cuckfield Sussex JENNER THOMAS M 1879 32 Cuckfield Sussex JENNER WILFRED M 1902 9 Cuckfield Sussex
No Minnie.
Sigh.
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
8 Feb 2009 03:29 |
Looking at the Bakers just a bit more ...
Sarah Amelia Baker was older than it says in the 1901.
This was the marriage:
Marriages Dec 1898 Baker Amelia Sarah Cuckfield 2b 382 Jenner Thomas Cuckfield 2b 382
Daughter Constance in the 1901, for info:
Births Dec 1899 Jenner Constance Elizabeth Cuckfield 2b 149
This is the best match for a birth, I'd say. (There were a heck of a lot of Sarah Bakers in Sussex, but that's the only one that fits.)
Births Jun 1871 Baker Amelia Sarah Lewes 2b 147
This has to be her in 1891:
Name: Amelia Sarah Baker Age: 19 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1872 Where born: Ditchling, Sussex, England Civil Parish: [Penge] Ecclesiastical parish: St Pauls Town: Penge County/Island: London Registration district: Croydon
William Leon Moon 46 - Lodging House Keeper Matilda Ann Moon 53 Charles John Moon 25 Harry Hill Moon 20 Margaret Ann Owens 35 Amelia Sarah Baker 19 - Kitchenmaid - Domestic Serv
It was a fancy-ish lodging house; lodgers are a ship broker and wife and a widow living on own means with children (one a med student).
Just think. If one of the Moon boys was Minnie's father, you might be related to Alfie Moon. ;)
And in 1881:
Name: Amelia S. Baker Age: 9 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1872 Relation: Daughter Father's Name: Daniel Mother's Name: Sarah Jane Where born: Ditchling, Sussex, England
Civil Parish: Ditchling County/Island: Sussex
Daniel Baker 44 - Coachman Domestic Serv Sarah Jane Baker 44 Frederick J. Baker 20 Arthur H. Baker 18 Thomas A. Baker 12 Amelia S. Baker 9 John A. Baker 7 William O. Baker 5
She was Amelia Sarah who went by Sarah.
Births of potential interest, but unlikely:
Births Mar 1891 BAKER Minnie Amelia Portsea 2b 494
Births Sep 1894 Baker Minnie Amelia St. Thomas 5b 45
I find this one interesting:
Births Jun 1892 Baker Minnie Brinkworth Lewes 2b 183
Very common for the child of an unmarried mother to have the father's surname as a middle name.There is a possible Sarah Brinkworth - Edward Baker marriage in 1885 in Hastings that could account for that birth, but I can't find them in 1901. Or 1891, for that matter. So they may not have been a couple. And I don't see any likely death for that Minnie Baker.
Can't find that Minnie Baker in 1901.
1911 is a wash. -- editing out 1911 bumph -- found the Baker-Jenner household in Cuckfield in 1911, see next post.
Searching for Minnie in households with Jenner, there's a list you might want to look at, but none in Lewes district.
So.
I like that Minnie Baker. Her mother was from Ditchling and was a domestic servant in London in 1891, that Minnie was born in Lewes district in 1892 and has a name that suggests she was born to an unmarried mother. And Sarah/Amelia Baker married a Jenner.
I wonder what the birth certificate would say?
Oh. I hadn't realized I could search 1911 by given name -- I thought it was surname only. Just to tidy up loose ends, here's one of possible interest:
INSTITUTION WHITE MINNIE AMELIA F 1892 19 Hastings Sussex
but this would likely be her:
Births Jun 1891 White Minnie Amelia Uxbridge 3a 30
I do like Minnie Brinkworth Baker for the job. Now if we could only find her in a census!!!
|
|
Vickier
|
Report
|
7 Feb 2009 19:58 |
I applaud your nosiness. I appreciate your help. Have tried searching under the Baker surname but othig has come up. Even thought her name might just be Amelia and Minnie a nickname. Thank you
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
7 Feb 2009 01:13 |
Go to google and put
hamsey sussex uk
in the search box, and the results should have a map at the top. Click on the map.
The three places form a triangle with each side about 5 miles long -- Chailey to the north, Ditchling to the southwest of Chailey, and Hamsey south and slightly east of Chailey, directly north of Lewes. Barcombe is just NNE of Hamsey. In case the geography is as unfamiliar to you as it is to me. ;)
You can zoom way in on Hamsey, which is basically the crossroads of Hamsey/Whitfield Lane and The Drove, it seems.
"Terrain" view shows a river, but no other water, but that's a representation, not photography.
"Satellite" view lets you see the actual land, and scanning around Hamsey close up might show a pond.
Forgive my nosiness! These little glimpses of social history are just one of the interesting things about hanging out on these boards. ;)
That, and puzzle-solving.
This family is in Lindfield in 1901 (reminding us of the mistranscription possibilities ...):
Name: Thomas Jenne [Thomas Jenner] Age: 22 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1879 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Amelia Where born: Cuckfield, Sussex, England
Name: Amelia Jenne [Amelia Jenner] Age: 26 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1875 Relation: Wife Spouse's Name: Thomas Where born: Wetchling, Sussex, England - Ditchling?
Registration district: Cuckfield Sub registration district: Lindfield
Thomas Jenne 22 Amelia Jenne 26 Constance Jenne 1
Correction made to Thomas Jenner's name:
Surname: Jenner Correction Type: Transcription Error Explanation: Thomas , Amelia and Constance have the surname Jenner and are not to be found anywhere else on 1901 census also address and dates are correct Contributed On: 23/05/2008
This is probably them ...
Marriages Dec 1898 Baker Amelia Sarah Cuckfield 2b 382 Jenner Thomas Cuckfield 2b 382
What I was thinking was: who better to have a daughter with middle name Amelia? Possibly before that marriage? Except she doesn't seem to have had ...
Played with it for a while, got nowhere further!
Your mention of the Ellen matching is interesting, too.
|
|
mgnv
|
Report
|
6 Feb 2009 22:50 |
The 1878 OS map shows a pair of locks on the R Ouse at Barcombe House, specifically Pikes Bridge Upper/Lower Locks (543300, 114900). Presumably the lower lock might use a pond for filling it - just a suggestion.
|
|
Vickier
|
Report
|
6 Feb 2009 22:09 |
I'm sorry, just read your notes from yesterday. Minnie does appear on the 1911 census and she was at school. She would've been able to write. All that worries me now is our findings on Henry Penfold.
|
|
Vickier
|
Report
|
6 Feb 2009 21:59 |
I'm really beginning to think the family with Alfred married to Mary is a real possibility. I'm wondering why Minnie doesn't appear in the 1911 census, but I suppose she could have been working. Even at that age. The other thing I find interesting is that Henry marked the birth cert with a cross. Minnie could write (very nicely) and signed it M Jenner. The residence of the informant is listed as the hut. The other thing is the name Ellen. It was given to the baby.
|
|
Vickier
|
Report
|
6 Feb 2009 21:48 |
Hello. The sub registration district of Barcombe in the census's is sometimes Ditchling and sometimes Chailey. I think we may be close. Thanks again Vicki
|
|
mgnv
|
Report
|
6 Feb 2009 21:21 |
I've seen Minnie as short for Williamina - maybe it was Wilhelmina.
|