Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
family in Mnchaster workhouse 1871?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 10 Jan 2009 15:20 |
I was looking for something else & came across this - baptism for George? date & place fit |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 9 Jan 2009 17:39 |
Don't give up on finding their deaths yet. You could try this site |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 9 Jan 2009 17:22 |
also found a possible baptism for son George at St Lawrence Longridge |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 9 Jan 2009 17:06 |
Slaters Directory is a commercial directory usually produced by county or area. there are other such as Kelly's. Most of them can be found on the site historicaldirectories.com. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Tracey | Report | 9 Jan 2009 16:07 |
Just wondering what is Slaters directory? I am almost 100% sure then he was not in workhouse so thank you for putting that to rest for me. I will have to accept the fact I cannot pinpoint deaths for George and Jane as there are so many Wilkinsons. But thanks for all your help! you are most kind. |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 9 Jan 2009 15:24 |
this is probably the closest we will get |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Tracey | Report | 9 Jan 2009 14:13 |
yes it seems as if they have got lost in the passing of time as he was there in 1881 I think I will just have to assume he was there in 1871 to. Thanks for letting me know he was not there in 1891. If you do manage to find him in 1851/41 please let me know - and thank you so much for taking the time to look for me, it is much appreciated. |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 9 Jan 2009 12:23 |
I suspect you will never find George on the 1871 census. In the Lancs Cro there is no record of Deepdale St nor of the higher house number end of Fletcher Road which on the other censuses runs into Deepdale St. The highest no on Fletcher Road is 179 but 1871 stops at 19! As that is also the end of the folio number I would suspect the next folios went missing a long time ago. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Tracey | Report | 7 Jan 2009 16:47 |
good point - I had not really considered that. I am pretty sure now then that it was not him in the workhouse. i will look at other census and see if I can find him! |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 7 Jan 2009 16:44 |
The reason I do not think that the 1871 George in a Manchester workhouse does not fit is just that - it was manchester. Parishes were rather particular as to who they could have as a charge on them so as he was in Preston in 1861 & 1881 it would seem likely that if he was in a workhouse it would be a Preston one. Preston Royal Infirmary opened in 1870. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 7 Jan 2009 13:47 |
To be honest Tracey, I am not sure that the one in the workhouse IS yours - his occupation does not sem to fit - I believe he is probably still in Deepdale Street but missed off the census. |
|||
|
Tracey | Report | 7 Jan 2009 10:05 |
this is getting more and more frustrating!!! I am beginning to think that my George was not in workhouse perhaps after all...it seems odd he would move from the pub and then go back to it! I do wish my family had less common names as it would be easier!! I feel frustrated that the address doesn't appear on 1871 census. As I cannot find Annie his daughter on the census either I am presuming they were together in Deepdale Street. It feels hard to admit defeat though! |
|||
|
Tin Fields | Report | 7 Jan 2009 09:16 |
Hi Peter, Scary isn't it? |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 7 Jan 2009 09:02 |
I really think this is them on 1871 - it is only a couple of streets away. |
|||
|
Tin Fields | Report | 7 Jan 2009 08:59 |
Just found this to explain what a Fustian Cutter is, |
|||
|
Tracey | Report | 6 Jan 2009 18:46 |
By chance Peter does it give his occupation as farmer? Annie said her father was a farmer on her marriage certificate - We think because she married into 'money' and didnt want family to know he was a publican. I think you are right for me to be cautious, it seems strange George was at Deepdale and then went back again, perhaps it was not him in workhouse....so frustrating. I havent been able to find Annie so maybe she was with her parents somewhere else........a mystery |
|||
|
Tracey | Report | 6 Jan 2009 14:45 |
thank you all for helping me in my quest to try to find Annie in 1871. Is a real mystery why they were at Deepdale Street in 1861 and 1881 but not 1871! I wonder if on the census it is Longridge RAILWAY HOTEL rather than 11 Deepdale Str - or perhaps there was a fire or soethng and it was uninhabited at the time. Annie must have gone somewhere! |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 6 Jan 2009 11:15 |
Thank you Peter, |
|||
|
lancashireAnn | Report | 5 Jan 2009 22:06 |
I'll try to look when I next go to Lancs Record office - should be sometime in next couple of weeks. They do have an index of streets for some census returns - as it is a Preston address that is probably one of them. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Dea | Report | 5 Jan 2009 21:01 |
Tracey, |