Find Ancestors

Top tip - using the Genes Reunited community

Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!

  • The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
  • You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
  • And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
  • The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.

Quick Search

Single word search

Icons

  • New posts
  • No new posts
  • Thread closed
  • Stickied, new posts
  • Stickied, no new posts

family in Mnchaster workhouse 1871?

Page 1 + 1 of 2

  1. «
  2. 1
  3. 2
ProfilePosted byOptionsPost Date

Dea

Dea Report 7 Jan 2009 13:47

To be honest Tracey, I am not sure that the one in the workhouse IS yours - his occupation does not sem to fit - I believe he is probably still in Deepdale Street but missed off the census.

BUT - don't forget that workhouses at the time were often used as hospitals so, if he was very ill at the time he could have gone into there for treatment, rather than because he was 'destitute', so it is not impossible.

Dea x

lancashireAnn

lancashireAnn Report 7 Jan 2009 16:44

The reason I do not think that the 1871 George in a Manchester workhouse does not fit is just that - it was manchester. Parishes were rather particular as to who they could have as a charge on them so as he was in Preston in 1861 & 1881 it would seem likely that if he was in a workhouse it would be a Preston one. Preston Royal Infirmary opened in 1870.

Tracey

Tracey Report 7 Jan 2009 16:47

good point - I had not really considered that. I am pretty sure now then that it was not him in the workhouse. i will look at other census and see if I can find him!

Tracey

lancashireAnn

lancashireAnn Report 9 Jan 2009 12:23

I suspect you will never find George on the 1871 census. In the Lancs Cro there is no record of Deepdale St nor of the higher house number end of Fletcher Road which on the other censuses runs into Deepdale St. The highest no on Fletcher Road is 179 but 1871 stops at 19! As that is also the end of the folio number I would suspect the next folios went missing a long time ago.
Still looking for George in 1851 & 1841.
In 1891 the Preston Longridge Railway Taven publican was Alice Banks a51.

Tracey

Tracey Report 9 Jan 2009 14:13

yes it seems as if they have got lost in the passing of time as he was there in 1881 I think I will just have to assume he was there in 1871 to. Thanks for letting me know he was not there in 1891. If you do manage to find him in 1851/41 please let me know - and thank you so much for taking the time to look for me, it is much appreciated.

Tracey

lancashireAnn

lancashireAnn Report 9 Jan 2009 15:24

this is probably the closest we will get

Preston directory 1873

Wilkinson George, vict., Preston & Longridge Railway tavern, 11 Deepdale St
Wilkinson George (his son?) commercial traveller, 16 east St

Also under tavern name in Slaters 1876 directory

Tracey

Tracey Report 9 Jan 2009 16:07

Just wondering what is Slaters directory? I am almost 100% sure then he was not in workhouse so thank you for putting that to rest for me. I will have to accept the fact I cannot pinpoint deaths for George and Jane as there are so many Wilkinsons. But thanks for all your help! you are most kind.
Tracey

lancashireAnn

lancashireAnn Report 9 Jan 2009 17:06

Slaters Directory is a commercial directory usually produced by county or area. there are other such as Kelly's. Most of them can be found on the site historicaldirectories.com.

I think it is safe to assume George was at 11 Deeepdale St in 1871 if he is shown as there in the 1873 deirectory as the directories would be published a couple of years or so after the data was collected.

I also had a look at the fiche for 1861 and George was born in Chaigley which is near Clitheroe. Unfortunately the 1881 fiches were not available to check the transcription on there as Chadesley does not seem to exist. Chaigley would fit with the son George being born in Longridge.

lancashireAnn

lancashireAnn Report 9 Jan 2009 17:22

also found a possible baptism for son George at St Lawrence Longridge
If correct the Jane shown in 1861 is his 2nd wife

18-6-1843 George son of George , a labourer, and Agnes of Dilworth

Dilworth is another village in the area

lancashireAnn

lancashireAnn Report 9 Jan 2009 17:39

Don't give up on finding their deaths yet. You could try this site
http://www.cemsearch.co.uk/preston/prestonW.html

St Luke's the local church to Deepdale St does not have a graveyard so they could be buried in the public cemetary

lancashireAnn

lancashireAnn Report 10 Jan 2009 15:20

I was looking for something else & came across this - baptism for George? date & place fit

Baptism: 23 Sep 1804 All Hallows, Mitton, Lancashire, England
George Wilkinson - First Son of William Wilkinson & Hannah (formerly Smithies)
Born: 7 Sep 1804
Abode: Chaigley
Occupation: Labourer
Register: Baptisms, Page 137, Entry 27
Source: LDS Film 919152