Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 21:09 |
One suggestion. You have:
Amy Violet 1898-?
? indeed -- John was dead. In the 1901 in this thread she is 11. 1889?
Yup.
Births Dec 1889 Smailes Amy Violet Islington 1b 297
You should probably edit that.
You might want to add John's approx DOB to the header (i.e. the subject line, not the opening post), just for info purposes.
No more luck, I'm afraid. I think I shall avoid Smailes threads in future, lol. They're a lost lot.
|
|
Pen
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 21:21 |
Oops, thanks for pointing that out. I'm wondering if there is a spelling or transcription error. I've already come across these errors with another line in my tree - Tuck/Took/Tooke - that gets VERY complicated.
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 21:26 |
Ha! Might there be a spelling/transcription error!
I have lost count of how many hundred corrections I have submitted to Ancestry. Mostly unrelated lost souls I have happened on by accident. Francis Pukes who was really Francis Dupré, that sort of thing. All of my households managed to get Ancestry's magic touch at least once during its lifetime I think though.
That's why I've been searching for Sma* and trying to search for a child with parents' given names, even with no surname. (Ancestry tends to make less of a hash of given names, although that's not reliable.)
I wonder. John was on vessels in 1881. Is it possible he had simply split, and Mary went on to have children with someone else, but register them under her official name? And the children would then appear under the step name. I've had no luck with that either.
Does his death cert show that he was living with them, e.g.?
Might be interesting to track that 1881 vessel down and see what bit of the military that John was in and whether it went anywhere, and whether family might have gone with him.
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 21:27 |
Submitted (unverified) record in IGI:
John SMALES Birth: About 1842 Kimberworth, Yorkshire, England Parents: Father: William SMALES Mother: Mrs. Hellen Smales
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 21:30 |
That Hellen is called Ellen in another submitted record. This looks like that batch in 1841:
Name: Ellen Smales Age: 32 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1819 Relation: Head Where born: Thorp Hesley, Yorkshire, England Civil Parish: Kimberworth County/Island: Yorkshire Registration district: Rotherham
Sarah Cunningham 31 Thomas Cunningham 48 Ann Smales 1 Ellen Smales 32 James Smales 6 > John Smales 9 Mary Smales 12 Matthew Smales 4
Spellings varied ...
|
|
Pen
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 21:45 |
M A Smailes registered the death, was present at death and is named as the widow. The 1901 Census record shows her with the children. I am in the process of trawling through the birth records - found a John James Taylor Smale 1842 in Exeter, think I'm just gonna have to be patient.
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
28 Nov 2008 21:52 |
I think Smale is a Cornwall/Devon name, while Smailes seems to be Durham /Northumberland-ish. I think they're two separate names, not that that would prevent Ancestry from muddling them.
But if yours were Smailes-s, I don't think looking at Smale-s in Cornwall/Devon is too likely. Somewhere else maybe, but there, they are likely to be real Smale-s.
|
|
Ajwyorks
|
Report
|
30 Nov 2008 12:14 |
1881 name wrong on census
John J. Mailes Age: 40 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1841 Relation: Head Spouse's Name: Mary A. Gender: Male Where born: Marylebone, Middlesex, England Civil Parish: Battersea County/Island: London Country: England Street address: 57 Rollo Rd Condition as to marriage: Married Education:
Employment status: View Image Occupation: Cooper Registration district: Wandsworth Sub registration district: Battersea ED, institution, or vessel: 53a Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Albert J. Mailes 1m b Battersea Emma M. Mailes 4 b Camberwell John J. Mailes 40 Mary A. Mailes 34 b Holborn
Andy
|
|
Pen
|
Report
|
30 Nov 2008 14:23 |
Thanks Andy - brilliant detective work. Can't express how pleased I am.
|
|
Pen
|
Report
|
1 Dec 2008 17:23 |
Sigh, it was good while it lasted. I spent 3 hours last night looking for John James Smailes born in London - searched 1839 to 1844 birth records and came up with nothing. Maybe he isn't registered. I've also been looking for 1871 and 1861 census records, without success - tried 6 or 7 different spellings.
Any ideas???
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
1 Dec 2008 20:51 |
I do wonder about this fellow in 1871.
The use of a middle initial in census records is commonly an indication that the person went by a middle name.
The occupation is Commercial Traveller -- I can't read the rest, but it's "[something] Grain; Seed Grain? -- which likely makes him unlikely, but otherwise he fits the bill.
Name: James Smaills Age: 27 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1844 Relation: Boarder Gender: Male Where born: London, England Civil Parish: Sculcoates Ecclesiastical parish: All Saints County/Island: Yorkshire
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
1 Dec 2008 20:55 |
There is also this household in 1861 in Marylebone, and one wonders whether he was an older child of this mother who had flown the nest by then, being about 20. The surname might read "Smails"; in fact, I would say it does.
Margaret Shonnacy 19 Eliza Smail 7 Hoyn Smail 12 (? Can't read any better) Mary Smail 39 - widowed, Charwoman Mary Smail 18 William Smail 9
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
1 Dec 2008 21:27 |
The "Hoyn" in that list looked like "Hoyse" to me.
I searched for Hoy* births in that period, and this is the only relevant one.
Births Sep 1849 CROSS Hoyse Edward Thirman St Martin 1 127
Smail(s) could have been a subsequent or previous married surname of mother Mary ...
I'm not finding the household in 1851.
|
|
Pen
|
Report
|
1 Dec 2008 22:04 |
Thanks Evie I've looked at the records and it's driving me batty. Think I'm gonna have to take a break and follow another line for a while. Thank you all for your help and I will keep looking on here, just in case.
|
|
Pen
|
Report
|
15 Jan 2009 19:32 |
Well it's been 6 weeks and I've found loads of stuff about other members of my family but still nothing on John James Smailes - I'm not giving up yet though - or on William, though I have a sneaky suspicion that William may have been born in the north somewhere I have no proof. I also think that John's birth may not have been recorded. Does anyone know if it would help if I went to London and searched some records, somewhere, anywhere????
|
|
Ajwyorks
|
Report
|
15 Jan 2009 21:11 |
Just found this
1871
John J Marles (Smailes on image) Age: 33 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1838 Relation: Lodger Gender: Male Where born: Northamptonshire, England Civil Parish: Clerkenwell Ecclesiastical parish: St James Pentonville County/Island: London Country: England Registration district: Holborn Sub registration district: Pentonville ED, institution, or vessel: 5 Neighbors: View others on page Household schedule number: 419 Household Members: Name Age Mary A Hoy 55 Mary A Hoy 18 George Hoy 19 Charles Hoy 14 John J Marles 33 Cooper
Andy
|
|
Pen
|
Report
|
16 Jan 2009 20:13 |
Thanks Andy, nice work. It does seem that this is the one though I'm not convinced it actually says Northamptonshire!
|
|
EvieBeavie
|
Report
|
16 Jan 2009 20:54 |
So where have you been all our lives, Andy?
Pam - I do think it says Northamptonshire. Compare the N to the N in Norfolk farther down the page, and the various Ms. I think Northamptonshire is the only way to read it. Whether it was true ... another matter. ;) But it would seem likely that if someone were going to report a birthplace other than where he was living, he'd name the right one. If he knew it ...
|
|
Pen
|
Report
|
16 Jan 2009 21:05 |
Thanks Evie, I'm sure you're right. it's just that in 1881 census (earlier in thread) he was born in Marylebone. I'm confused! Maybe I'm trying to see something that isn't there.
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
16 Jan 2009 21:11 |
No Pen
your ancestor is trying to confuse you!!
don't get hung up on birthplaces, birthyears, or spellings!!
Most of our ancestors were illiterate
Many answered the enumerator's question of "where do you come from?" literally .... ie, they said they came from Northampton because that was where they last lived. Whereas the enumerator meant "where were you born?".
Many of them didn't KNOW where they were born, especially if the parents had moved soon after the child was born. For all they knew, they came from Northampton because that is where they grew up.
In many cases, someone else gave the information ....... and may not have known but guessed.
Above all ............. remember that genealogy is an inexact science. In many cases, we have to take a leap of faith because the absolute definitive proof just cannot be found because it does not exist.
sylvia
|