Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
ziggy
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 18 Jan 2009 00:02 |
Er. Ahem. |
|||
|
Jean | Report | 18 Jan 2009 00:22 |
Ops...I ment married in 1894. Sorry about that. To excited about all this news you see.. Ha! Ha!. |
|||
|
Jean | Report | 20 Jan 2009 00:25 |
Having looked at original 1911 census I have diacovered that my grandparents William and Mary Williams had two other children that died. |
|||
|
Jean | Report | 28 Jan 2009 17:13 |
NOW TRYING TO TRACE MY GRANDMOTHERS FAMILY. |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 28 Jan 2009 23:43 |
Dang, Carol, I didn't get to use up my few remaining SP credits in the few remaining hours I have for doing it. ;) |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 28 Jan 2009 23:51 |
Here's the only other record of a James Richardson born c1841 in Wigtown, at Ancestry -- most likely the same one: |
|||
|
Jean | Report | 29 Jan 2009 11:39 |
thank you for your quick responses. |
|||
|
Jean | Report | 29 Jan 2009 22:34 |
THANKS CAROL-SCOTLAND AND EVIE BEAVIE YES IT LOOKS LIKE IT COULD BE THEM BUT I AM CONFUSED ON WHO THE JEAN WAS AGED 25 IN 1841 AND WHERE WAS JANET THEN (MOTHER) |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 29 Jan 2009 23:12 |
Name variations, I'd say -- Jane / Janet / Jean somewhat interchangeable. |
|||
|
Jean | Report | 29 Jan 2009 23:43 |
It was also the age difference jean 25 in 1841 and janet 40 in 1851 ??? |
|||
|
Jean | Report | 30 Jan 2009 13:20 |
I am trying to folow this info through. It looks as though James amust have died around 1849/50.??? |