Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Help - what to do next?
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Rachel | Report | 8 Mar 2008 11:12 |
Excellent to see Louisa and Eveline's birth references. |
|||
|
Nicki | Report | 8 Mar 2008 11:08 |
Eveline |
|||
|
Nicki | Report | 8 Mar 2008 11:06 |
Louisa |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 8 Mar 2008 11:03 |
I hadn't noticed the gap as being so large. I hadn't thought of the fact that Emma could be a second wife. I |
|||
|
ErikaH | Report | 8 Mar 2008 10:48 |
I was in the process of posting to your other thread...........and it disappeared! |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 8 Mar 2008 10:39 |
Just looking back through the information - there is no mention of James on any census or when he was born, married or died - can anyone help please? |
|||
|
Nicki | Report | 8 Mar 2008 10:26 |
nudged |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 7 Mar 2008 18:01 |
Wow - thank you for all your help - it is appreciated. I shall certainly be requesting some certificates. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 7 Mar 2008 17:49 |
This is Emma on the 1881 now a Widower |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 7 Mar 2008 17:48 |
Glitter Baby, |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 7 Mar 2008 17:46 |
Mmm it could be. It would certainly fit in with the information on the marriage certificate (regarding his age). Louth is in Lincolnshire which would tie in with the information on the 1891 census. |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 7 Mar 2008 17:46 |
Hi Rachel |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 7 Mar 2008 17:45 |
Oops my mistake on 1861 census as obviously the wrong man. Especially as I have just found him married in 1881. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Nicki | Report | 7 Mar 2008 17:44 |
I wonder if this is your William? |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 7 Mar 2008 17:42 |
Hi Glitter Baby, |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 7 Mar 2008 17:40 |
Thank you Julie. You certainly seem to be doing better than me with Florence. I have just noticed that Florence's father James is not there - what is Emma's status of marriage on the census please? |
|||
|
GlitterBaby | Report | 7 Mar 2008 17:40 |
1861 best match |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Nicki | Report | 7 Mar 2008 17:39 |
Possible birth for Florence |
|||
|
Shirley~I,m getting the hang of it | Report | 7 Mar 2008 17:39 |
this looks like them on the 1891 |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Julie | Report | 7 Mar 2008 17:37 |
1871 |