Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
ChristineinPortugal
|
Report
|
8 Mar 2008 23:27 |
Hi Rose,
If our theories are right, when the marriage cert arrives the name of Frances Amelias father will be Edwin, but I wouldn't hold out too much hope.
If this is the case Frances Hopkinson would have been Jessie Laykinschildren's great grandmother not grandmother.
If you go back to the postings on page 3 almost at the end of the family that Margaret found with a Fanny L Lakins in 1891 and 1901,the same family in 1881 had Fanny Eaton as a visitor.
This Fanny Eaton was married to Edwin Eaton and had children called Fanny, Herbert and Teresa.
Can you follow this, don't know if I'm explaining very well.
Christine
|
|
sprucespringclean
|
Report
|
8 Mar 2008 22:58 |
Hi All I have only just put grandaughter to bed and got on line, my gosh you have been busy, i have not posted today because the cert didn't arrive this morning. If there is anything i can help you with please let me know. Hope it comes on Monday, You have lost me on this i'am afraid.
Regards Rose x
|
|
MargaretM
|
Report
|
8 Mar 2008 21:31 |
I'm with you, Christine, it's driving me mad, too! I keep walking away from it then coming back to try another angle. I'm suspecting there might br something wrong right from square one, The business of Frances Amelia vs Frances Lillian. Then again how can we find Fanny Violet when we don't know what name she was registered under. As Angela says the Lakins could have given her a new forename when they gave her their surname. It's a real puzzler. Margaret
|
|
ChristineinPortugal
|
Report
|
8 Mar 2008 20:14 |
It's a mystery isn't it as most of the things fit now.
It's driving me mad this family.
Christine
|
|
Angela now in Wilts (not North Devon)
|
Report
|
8 Mar 2008 19:35 |
Hi Christine
But everything else fits - p'raps she didn't like the middle name Lilian?
The names Edwin, Frances & Theresa fit with what was posted originally.
The census records that have been found fit.
I wonder if Fanny Violet was originally registered in a different first name & the Lakins changed it?
Angela
|
|
ChristineinPortugal
|
Report
|
8 Mar 2008 19:30 |
Just remembered that the Frances married to Job died in 1935, she was 62 according to the death reg but another problem with this theory aswell as the age is that she was Frances Amelia and the daughter of Edwin and Fanny E Eaton was Lilian.
Christine
|
|
ChristineinPortugal
|
Report
|
8 Mar 2008 19:04 |
That's just where it got me Margaret, absolutely nowhere. I also traced John Lakins back all the way to 1841 too.
I can't find the Eaton family in 1901 though, they must be somewhere.
I also thought like you Angela that Fanny Violet may be the illegitimate daughter of Fanny L Eaton born but she would have been very young.
We need Rose now and the marriage cert to see how old the Frances was that married Job Hopkinson.
Christine
|
|
Angela now in Wilts (not North Devon)
|
Report
|
8 Mar 2008 18:25 |
What fantastic detective work on this thread! Well done Christine & Margaret!
My two penn'orth, Fanny Violet 'Lakin' was the illegitimate daughter of Frances Eaton (dau 0f Edwin & Fanny E). She was adopted by John Lakin & his wife Harriet E (nee Hope) & took on their surname.
Now, where's her birth reg?.........
Angela
|
|
MargaretM
|
Report
|
8 Mar 2008 18:22 |
1851 census 39 Court, 1 House, Livery St., Birmingham, Warwickshire Elizabeth Handcocks, head, widow, 70, pauper formerly laundress Francis Hope, son-in-law, 34, german silver spoon maker Matilda Hope, dau, 38, metal button piercer Harriet Hope, grandau, 5, scholar Elizabeth born Wolverhampton, Staffs, others born Birmingham.
Well, this was an excercise in futility. It hasn't led me anywhere. We know that Matilda Handcocks married Francis Hope and they had a daughter Harriet who married John Lakins. In 1891 John & Harriet Lakins had an adopted daughter Violet Lakins who was later Fanny V. Lakins.They had visitors in the household in 1881, Fanny Eaton and daughter Jessie.
|
|
MargaretM
|
Report
|
8 Mar 2008 18:12 |
1861 census 188 Gt. Hampton Row, Birmingham, Warwickshire Francis Hope, head, 44, german silver spoon maker Matilda, wife, 50, gilt toy (something?) Harriet, dau, 16, paper box maker Joseph, boarder, 46, porter All born Birmingham
|
|
MargaretM
|
Report
|
8 Mar 2008 18:00 |
1871 census 1 Drayton Terrace, Aston, Birmingham, Warwickshire John Lakins, head, 30, grocer's assistant Harriet E., wife, 25 Francis Hope, wife's father, 52, german silver spoon maker Louisa Farnall, servant, 16 John born Aston, others, Birmingham.
|
|
ChristineinPortugal
|
Report
|
8 Mar 2008 16:03 |
I'm getting a bit bogged down with them, have found a marriage of Edwin Eaton to Frances but that doesn't give me any clues at the moment.
Marriages Mar 1868 (>99%) <<<Eaton Edwin King's Norton 6c 466 Johnston Jonathan Jenkins King's N 6c 466 <<<Sanders Fanny Eliza King's Norton 6c 466 Steele Ellen Maria King's N 6c 466
You had the correct family back on page 1 on the 1891 census Margaret.
I'm going to leave it for a while too.
Christine
|
|
MargaretM
|
Report
|
8 Mar 2008 15:51 |
Oh, we're on a roll now, Christine! I really must leave it for a while now. It's almost 11 in the morning and I'm still sitting here in my pj's. One good thing about a snowstorm, there's no chance of anyone dropping in! Margaret
|
|
ChristineinPortugal
|
Report
|
8 Mar 2008 15:22 |
Now to find out whose daughter Fanny Violet was and what Frances Eaton's maiden mame was.
Christine
|
|
ChristineinPortugal
|
Report
|
8 Mar 2008 15:18 |
Hi Margaret, That is certainly more likely than the one I found as Fanny Violet's occupation was a milliner when Jessie was born in 1907 according to Rose, and look at the 1881 census for them
1881 England Census about Francis Hope Name: Francis Hope Age: 62 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1819 Relation: Father in Law Gender: Male Where born: Aston, Warwickshire, England Civil Parish: Kings Norton County/Island: Worcestershire Country: England Street address: Miliners Shop 26 Highgate Lane Condition as to marriage: Widow Education:
Employment status: View Image Occupation: Spoon & Fork Maker Registration district: Kings Norton Sub-registration district: Kings Norton ED, institution, or vessel: 21b Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Fanny Eaton 34 married visitor born Warwickshire, Aston Jessie Eaton 2 born Bradfield, Yorks Louisa Farnell 24 Francis Hope 62 Harriet E. Larkins 35 John Larkins 40
Source Citation: Class: RG11; Piece: 2948; Folio: 115; Page: 20; Line: ; GSU roll: 1341706.
Source Information: Source Citation: Class: RG11; Piece: 2948; Folio: 115; Page: 20; Line: ; GSU roll: 1341706.
At last the connection to Frances Eaton
Christine
|
|
MargaretM
|
Report
|
8 Mar 2008 13:51 |
Hi again, I'm stuck in the worst snowstorm of the winter with nothing better to do than genealogical research. Now, I'm going to throw a monkeywrench into the works. (Sorry you folks call it a spanner) After agreeing with Christine that she had the right Violet/Violetta, I've come across this one, She's Fanny V. in 1901 and Violet in 1891. And to make things even more complicated, she's listed as adopted daughter in 1891. What do you think?
1901 census 26 Highgate Rd., Balsal Heath, South Birmingham, Warwickshire John Lakins, head, 60, clerk, commercial Harriet E., wife, 55, milliner *Fanny V., dau, 17, milliner Louise Farnell, servant, 44, housekeeper All born Birmingham.
1891 census 26 Highgate Rd., Kings Norton, Sth Birmingham, Warwickshire John Lakins, head, 50, clerk Harriet, wife, 45, milliner Francis Hope, father-in-law, widower, 75 *Violet Lakins, adopted daughter, 8, scholar Louisa Farnell, boarder, 32 All born Birmingham except Violet Born Yorkshire!
|
|
sprucespringclean
|
Report
|
7 Mar 2008 23:53 |
Hi Christine Just a thought my uncle "said" one of the reasons he believed John was the father is that Frances and John worked together. I don't know where he got this info from, but what if , Villetta was niece to John they both came from Shepshed. There is a possible connection and he got Frances to take the baby ( Jessie ). My mind i guess is working overtime, what do you think ?
Regards Rose x
|
|
ChristineinPortugal
|
Report
|
7 Mar 2008 23:39 |
You may find more when the 1911 census is released but on the other hand possibly not.
Christine
|
|
sprucespringclean
|
Report
|
7 Mar 2008 23:27 |
Hi Christine & Margaret
No Fanny in the village at this time it was mainly men that were on elect rolls, as they were the head of household. I do believe from what i could make out the only women listed where property owners. The only Lakin registered was a Thomas Jnr Lakin on the common, no sign of a John Lakin on the common. I will have to get his death cert to find out where he was living, if not in Crich he was still somewhere in the area as Belper covers surrounding areas. I think there are many questions we will never find the answers to. I wonder if she just added the name John on her wedding cert as to say she had a father when she got married. Hopefully i will receive Frances's and Job's marriage cert in the morning, as i ordered from same office their marriage was registered.
Regards Rose x
Thankyou for your time on this .
|
|
MargaretM
|
Report
|
7 Mar 2008 23:01 |
Hi again, Rose. I believe that the death certificate would give you the address of where the death occurred but I stand to be corrected. I think that the Violetta Lakin that Christine found could very well be the mother of your Jessie but how on earth did Jessie become the daughter of Job Nightingale Hopkinson and Frances Eaton? And why did the grandchildren call Frances "grandma" and Job "uncle"?
|