Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Strange details on a marriage certificate
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
jansmith | Report | 1 Mar 2008 23:58 |
1861 ? |
|||
|
Battenburg | Report | 1 Mar 2008 23:53 |
|
|||
|
June | Report | 1 Mar 2008 23:51 |
Marriages Sep 1856 (>99%) |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 1 Mar 2008 23:42 |
|
|||
|
Kay???? | Report | 1 Mar 2008 23:40 |
Ivy, |
|||
|
Battenburg | Report | 1 Mar 2008 23:34 |
|
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 1 Mar 2008 23:28 |
Janice - thanks for looking - I really thought you had found them then. I'm tired and calling it a night. Will look again tomorrow. |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 1 Mar 2008 23:14 |
1861 mother Ellen?? |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 1 Mar 2008 23:12 |
Both Matilda and Charles were "full age" - Matilda was born 1852, so she would have been 21 in March 1872. It is possible that Charles was 21 before the 27.10.1872. |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 1 Mar 2008 23:04 |
Can't remember their names as I have kept the certificate in a file, but I remember that their names did not match any in my family tree at the moment, and 1 of the witnesses made their mark, whilst 1 was able to write their name. |
|||
|
Battenburg | Report | 1 Mar 2008 23:04 |
|
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 1 Mar 2008 23:03 |
Marriage certificates are copies. The parties would complete the marriage register entry and a copy would go to the local registry office. Details would be sent on to the general register office. Certificates purchased from the GRO would be in the handwriting of a clerk employed there. |
|||
|
Battenburg | Report | 1 Mar 2008 23:01 |
|
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 1 Mar 2008 23:01 |
Thank you for your time and research - it is appreciated. I shall have to see if I can find details of Edward's death, to see if the Edward theory works. |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:53 |
If the occupation is left blank, then the Edward theory is really only possible if he died 1871/72... |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:52 |
1871: |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:50 |
Charles and Matilda married in Christ Church, Eccleston. |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:50 |
Both Charles and Matilda made their marks - no signatures there. The "father's" occupation was left blank - which is what I would expect to see for a mother/widow. |
|||
|
Kay???? | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:48 |
|
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:48 |
Have you got an occupation for the father on the cert. |