Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Strange details on a marriage certificate
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Rachel | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:12 |
Hello, |
|||
|
maryjane-sue | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:28 |
The person was base-born maybe? |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:28 |
When was the marriage would the family be on a census? |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:31 |
Could look for a birth index to get the certificate for parents name |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:34 |
Sorry, do not know what you mean by 'base-born.' |
|||
|
WayneTracey | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:37 |
Base-born is the term used for an illegitimate child. |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:38 |
There is a Charles son of Edward in Eccleston in 1871. Could this be your relative? If so, is it possible that Edward was shortened to Edw and then mistranscribed along the line - the two strokes of the "d" as "ll" and the "w" as "en"? |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:40 |
1881 for ref? |
|||
|
Ann | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:44 |
Does the certificate show that Charles signed it or did he 'make his mark'? If he couldn't read it's possible the registrar misheard the name and Charles was unable to spot the mistake. |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:46 |
Hi, |
|||
|
maryjane-sue | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:47 |
Was the "father's" occupation given on the marriage certificate? |
|||
|
jansmith | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:48 |
Have you got an occupation for the father on the cert. |
|||
|
Kay???? | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:48 |
|
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:50 |
Both Charles and Matilda made their marks - no signatures there. The "father's" occupation was left blank - which is what I would expect to see for a mother/widow. |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:50 |
Charles and Matilda married in Christ Church, Eccleston. |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:52 |
1871: |
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 1 Mar 2008 22:53 |
If the occupation is left blank, then the Edward theory is really only possible if he died 1871/72... |
|||
|
Rachel | Report | 1 Mar 2008 23:01 |
Thank you for your time and research - it is appreciated. I shall have to see if I can find details of Edward's death, to see if the Edward theory works. |
|||
|
Battenburg | Report | 1 Mar 2008 23:01 |
|
|||
|
Ivy | Report | 1 Mar 2008 23:03 |
Marriage certificates are copies. The parties would complete the marriage register entry and a copy would go to the local registry office. Details would be sent on to the general register office. Certificates purchased from the GRO would be in the handwriting of a clerk employed there. |