Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Long lost Unlce
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Cathy | Report | 16 Jul 2010 17:45 |
Flick, |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 16 Jul 2010 17:08 |
Mille mercis, Flick. ;) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 16 Jul 2010 17:06 |
Cathy -- whether it was the correct or incorrect person, the possibility of them being living is the main thing. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 16 Jul 2010 17:02 |
Have found and PMed marriages for three daughters and am checking BT on line and 192.com ... |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 16 Jul 2010 17:01 |
Well done, Janey................how on earth did Joanne not know that? |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 16 Jul 2010 16:59 |
People married in 1943 are extremely unlikely to be alive today.......on the other hand, someone born in 1939 most probably is. |
|||
|
Cathy | Report | 16 Jul 2010 16:52 |
Janey, I am a confused as to why you think I should remove a 1939 birth |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 16 Jul 2010 16:22 |
I think I have indeed solved it. Nah -- I know it. ;) |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
JaneyCanuck | Report | 16 Jul 2010 16:05 |
We're talking about people who are likely living here and there are some fine lines when it comes to what should be posted in public. |
|||
Researching: |
|||
|
Joanne | Report | 16 Jul 2010 14:55 |
i have thought that as well but!!!!! |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 16 Jul 2010 14:38 |
I'm beginning to wonder if Hubbard was actually Russell's surname................. |
|||
|
Cathy | Report | 16 Jul 2010 13:47 |
Joanne you are not thick....... just new to this as we all were once! |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 16 Jul 2010 13:03 |
The bit about click to see others on page is not relevant to your search...........it would have been better if the poster had deleted it. |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 16 Jul 2010 13:02 |
Are you basing you assumption about his year of birth on the birth info found for you? |
|||
|
Joanne | Report | 16 Jul 2010 13:01 |
sorry what do you mean by click to see others on page?? |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 16 Jul 2010 13:00 |
There is no marriage for a George Hubbard to anyone with surname Beck*...although, if the mother had been married previously, her name when she re-married would not have been Beck |
|||
|
Joanne | Report | 16 Jul 2010 12:47 |
it is Marie sorry i can't spell and sometime i get my words in a muddle. |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 16 Jul 2010 11:30 |
Thank you Joanne......can I ask you now just to confirm that the man's wife was MARIE..........your original posting had her as MARIA.......and the one letter makes a huge difference when searching. |
|||
|
Joanne | Report | 16 Jul 2010 11:12 |
Hi |
|||
|
Flick | Report | 16 Jul 2010 10:49 |
I have tried - in vain - to find sibling births matching the names given for the man's 'children' . |