Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
Riall and Rigney family
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Catherine | Report | 17 May 2010 17:28 |
This one is noted as Bricklayer:- |
|||
|
Catherine | Report | 17 May 2010 17:34 |
Possible marriage:- |
|||
|
Catherine | Report | 17 May 2010 17:36 |
Possible children for this couple, so possible siblings for Lucy:- |
|||
|
Mikie | Report | 17 May 2010 17:40 |
Thanks for that cathrine.I have lucy as having a sister sarah stone(Riall) 1809 but maybe it could be her aunt. |
|||
|
Catherine | Report | 17 May 2010 17:41 |
This looks to be Maria (youngest child from 1841 census) in 1851:- |
|||
|
Mikie | Report | 17 May 2010 17:48 |
I also have elizabeth riall as possilbe sibling 1825.Elizabeth was present at lucy rialls marriage to william rigney. |
|||
|
Catherine | Report | 17 May 2010 17:51 |
This would be George from 1841:- |
|||
|
Catherine | Report | 17 May 2010 17:56 |
Possible death for William:- |
|||
|
Mikie | Report | 17 May 2010 17:59 |
Thanks for your help cathrine.i am new to this board so all info is greatly recieved. |
|||
|
Catherine | Report | 17 May 2010 18:01 |
There's also this that could be a death of wife Ann:- |
|||
|
Mikie | Report | 17 May 2010 18:09 |
Yes it seems a bit strange that i cannot find any ties with her parents or siblings on the census. |
|||
|
Catherine | Report | 17 May 2010 18:24 |
Possible 1841 for James Rigney:- |
|||
|
Catherine | Report | 17 May 2010 18:27 |
Not really strange Mikie, as she was 20yrs old in 1841 and most girls over the age of 15yr. would have been married or in service in those days. |
|||
|
Catherine | Report | 17 May 2010 18:29 |
This one is also a Labourer so also worth keeping on file:- |
|||
|
Mikie | Report | 17 May 2010 18:57 |
Thanks again cathrine for all your help.I am off to work soon so i will be back on the board some time tomorrow. |