Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Allan
|
Report
|
31 Aug 2014 03:54 |
Joonie,
Just a thought.
I was showing the book about Stanley Barracks by Aldona Sendzikas and the copies of the sketches of the New Fort etc
Something niggled at the back of my mind and when I revisited the sketch book I realised that the last sketch was drawn in Canada in 1850.
Thereafter the pad is blank
In the 1851 Census Francis is listed at The Hall, Barrow upon Soar and he is shown as a Captain in the Army.
If I could find out which Regiment Francis was in I could see where he may have been stationed prior to the 1851 census
If, and that's a big if, it was in Canada that could provide a link between the Sketch books and the Mortimers
Allan
|
|
Allan
|
Report
|
31 Aug 2014 00:53 |
Joonie,
I will need to revisit your PM's re security, but you're right. "If 'twere done, then it better be done swiftly, than not at all"
Or something like that :-D
|
|
JoonieCloonie
|
Report
|
31 Aug 2014 00:28 |
Allan! I just checked my DNA email inbox and the big end of summer sale is on.
https://www.familytreedna.com/y-dna-compare.aspx
scroll down ... you want the YDNA-67 test, now on at $199 US down from regular $268 (they only do prices in USD)
this is the time to do it ... there will probably be a Christmas sale too, but why wait ?!
any close match you receive at the 67-marker level will be meaningful (at 37 it might not be) and then you can decide whether to test further to try to narrow down the relationship
(my male rellie matched so closely at 67 that I have not upgraded to 111 because it probably would not tell us any more ... the differences that there already are at 67 suggest the match is virtually definite but probably means a common ancestor in the 1500s or 1600s and going to 111 would not prove anything better than that)
the sale ends on what they call 9/3/2014 which is September 3
|
|
JoonieCloonie
|
Report
|
31 Aug 2014 00:12 |
just another note, I checked out an 1878 marriage for a William Mortimer in Chorlton reg dist where the family was in 1871 and Joseph and Jane remained
but in 1881 that William was with wife Agnes in Chorlton and was born in 1850 in Scotland
that response wasn't tardy at all, heavens ... now stop feeding your nephew alcohol! :-D
|
|
Allan
|
Report
|
30 Aug 2014 23:41 |
Joonie,,
Forgive the tardy response.
I have my nephew staying with me this weekend, together with his wife and eight year old daughter.
I'd forgotten how exhausting an eight year old can be, particularly when she discovers our two Guinea Pigs in the Garden :-D
Then last night my two adult children were here with their respective partners etc. Quite a houseful, and very noisy once the alcohol was flowing
Thanks for the information on William of Oldham: I had found his birth.
I'm going to have to revisit FMP :-|
I did check the outgoing passenger lists, but couldn't see William, then again I do find records on FMP and then can't see them again for a while.
I do try to download anything which seems relevant, but sometimes, for whatever reasons, the download fails.
What is the saying about artificial intelligence being no match for natural stupidity
Allan
|
|
JoonieCloonie
|
Report
|
30 Aug 2014 20:02 |
'A William Mortimer does appear in the 1891 Census in Oldham and is shown as a Beer and Wine dealer'
in 1871 in Rusholme Joseph was a provisions dealer in 1881 he was a beer and provision dealer in 1891 he was with his sister Elizabeth Elms? who is a grocer and beer retailer and he is a squiggle which could mean a ditto
(in 1891 Jane is with her married daughter Sarah Ann Borroughs in Rusholme)
the William Mortimer in the 1891 was 35 (c1856) and a beerseller born in Oldham
however ... he is not your William son of Joseph and Jane ... in 1871 and 1881 he is in Oldham with parents Frederick and Betsey
so yes, Joseph and Jane's William is elusive after 1871
FMP has these two outbound passengers that would match with the inbound you noted (I don't have access to passenger records at either FMP or Ancestry) W MORTIMER — LIVERPOOL 1890 NEW YORK United States WM MORTIMER 1858 LIVERPOOL 1893 NEW YORK United States
(the other W Mortimers travelling 1890-1894 had middle initials)
they certainly sound like the same person in the inbound records you found ... not likely two of that name were painters
on what Sylvia said ... it could even be that Adelaide was Clifford's housekeeper before they married
on Sutton/Satton, I looked at the image again and yes, Satton is just an Ancestry misreading of Sutton :-) see the links in my last post to the print of the baronet riding to hounds etc. (I think the seller didn't know what the 'Bart' meant)
so many side trips, so little progress !!!
yes it will be interesting to see who the informants of Joseph's and Jane's deaths were
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
30 Aug 2014 04:58 |
oh, I don't know about that!!
some gilrs obviously decided that it was better to marry an old man than to be a spinster ..................
and equally obviously decided they didn't mind being a nurse, or an old man's darling
I have actually heard of young women marrying men older than 50
I came across one just the other week.
I was helping someone on here ............... and it turned out that the woman she was looking for was living as Housekeeper for the man in one census (I think the 1901). She was aged 20 or 21, he was in his 60s ................ and she already had 2 very young children.
By the next census, they said they were married, and had several more children.
He had had at least 2 previous wives, and children with each of them ............................
.................... and he was only an Ag Lab!
Remember, there wasn't much else for women to do then other than marry, work a menial job, be a servant in someone's house, be a "companion" for some witchy old woman ........... or go on the streets.
|
|
Allan
|
Report
|
30 Aug 2014 03:06 |
Joonie,
Not that it is of any consequence, but I Googled Richard Satton Bart, but all the searches pulled up Sir Richard Sutton.
The only niggle I have with the C Mortimer and CG Mortimer is the date of Birth (as well as not being able to find them, or him, onFreeBMD)
While it may happen with actors etc today, I can't see 50 odd year old male marrying a 20 something female back in 1904
Clifford certainly didn't appear to have pots of money given that they were boarding in 1911
|
|
JoonieCloonie
|
Report
|
30 Aug 2014 00:59 |
okay, still confused about Satton/Sutton ... I did find references in old papers etc to Richard Satton baronet but they could be misreadings too
the problem with William is that the whole reason I at least was looking at this family was the C Mortimer in 1871 and 1891 whose occupation matched your Clifford and who was born around or just before 1850 as I recall
this Joseph Mortimer isn't actually a coach painter so there would be no reason to settle on him as the Joseph Mortimer named on Clifford's marriage certificate
it would make sense if this Joseph Mortimer were his stepfather
if you do happen to settle on Sutton as your ancestral line ...
http://tinyurl.com/o3oqvs2
http://tinyurl.com/ouylb9a
train that nephew up !
|
|
Allan
|
Report
|
30 Aug 2014 00:58 |
Neither am I Sylvia :-D
But it does give a possible connection between Jane and Joseph and how they met, if they were both working for the same family.
Just wondering why, when Jane was shown on the 1851 census as being at The Hall, Barrow upon Soar, Leicestershire, and being at Skeffington Hall, Skeffington, Billesdon, Leicestershire in 1861, her address (and Joseph's) in 1853 when they married (at St George Hanover Square) is shown simply as Piccadilly.
On the record I have for Francis, his address at the time of his marriage, is 96 Piccadilly
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
30 Aug 2014 00:43 |
I'm not sure where that has left you though :-)
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
30 Aug 2014 00:27 |
It does look as though the surname is DAMER
|
|
Allan
|
Report
|
30 Aug 2014 00:25 |
Thanks Sylvia
On the face of I, there appears to be a strong connection, at least for Jane Mortimer (nee Rayne), with the Suttons
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
30 Aug 2014 00:24 |
just out of silly interest :-)
from a Public Tree on ancestry
Lionel Seymour William DAWSON DAMER Birth 7 Apr 1832 in Of, Emo Park, Leix, Ireland Death 17 Dec 1892 in Bournemouth, , , England
Harriet Lydia Montagu Birth 23 Jul 1829 in , Armagh, , Ireland Death 23 Nov 1894 in Franham Royal, Buckinghamshire, , England
Title 1889 — Age: 57 Succeeeded his cousin as 4th Earl od Portarlington, an Irish peer
of course, you can't trust ancestry trees :-D
another one has ...........
Lionel Seymour William Dawson Damer 4th Earl of Portarlington Birth 7 Apr 1832 in Brighton, Sussex, England Death 17 Dec 1892 in Bournemouth, Dorset, England
Harriet Lydia Montagu Rokeby Birth 23 Jul 1829 in Marylebone, London, England Death 23 Nov 1894 in Farnham Royal, Buckinghamshire, England
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
30 Aug 2014 00:16 |
Interesting ........................
Allan ............
if you look on freebmd, Evelyn's surname is Damer, and her brother (???) got married around the same timee
Marriages Jun 1855 (>99%)
DAMER Evelyn Mary Stuart Dawson St Geo H Sq 1a 364 DAMER Lionel Seymour William Dawson St Geo H Sq 1a 364 MONTAGU Harriet Lydia St Geo Han Sq 1a 364 SUTTON Francis St Geo Han Sq 1a 364
from ancestry ....................
London and Surrey, England, Marriage Bonds and Allegations, 1597-1921
Name: Lionel Seymour William Dawson Damer Age: 21 Birth Year: abt 1834 Event Date: 16 Apr 1855 Parish: St Pauls Wilton Place County: Middlesex Spouse's Name: Honourable Harriet Montagu Spouse's Age: 21 Spouse's Parish: St Marylebone Spouse's County: Middlesex Event Type: Allegation Reference Number: MS10091/232
It is a whole page detailing his application for a License to marry Harriet Montague
|
|
Allan
|
Report
|
29 Aug 2014 23:51 |
Also, I'm waiting for the Death Certs for both Joseph and Jane Mortimer.
I'm interested in who the informants were!
I won't be able to much this weekend as I have my nephew and his family staying with us. He is the one who is interested in the Family History.
He also changed his first name from Paul to Porle :-S I must ask him whether the change is a legal one, or just a whim
|
|
Allan
|
Report
|
29 Aug 2014 23:19 |
JC
The young Francis is a Sutton, not a Satton.
Interestingly, in both 1851 and in 1861 Jane is working for the same family although the locations are different.
Also of Interest is that Francis (the Captain) married one Evelyn Mary Stuart Dawson Daner (not sure about the last name) on April 19 1855
Evelyn's father is shown as George Lionel Dawson Daner (?) Colonel
Correct Francis as his father is shown as Sir Richard Sutton Bart
It becomes better....Francis was married in St George, Hanover Square and his address is shown as Piccadilly.
Could Francis be the 'Gentleman' to whom Joseph Mortimer was shown as being Valet to on the 1851 Census?
I only have a copy of the parish record of the marriage, not an actual certificate.
I am also looking at Joseph and Jane's son William, who is a close fit for my grandfather's age, having been born in 1858.
As William does not seem to appear after the 1871 Census I have been trying to find a possible Death for him.
A William Mortimer does appear in the 1891 Census in Oldham and is shown as a Beer and Wine dealer
A death is shown for that William in the September quarter 1897.
I have also found two William Mortimer's who arrived in Liverpool from New York.
One was on the 'Umbria' and arrived on 7 th May 1891, the other arrived on the 'Campania' on 19 June 1893
Both are shown as 'Painter'
Two separate people or the same person twice?
(I had a free weekend access to Ancestry last weekend, which is where I found the two arrivals)
If the port of arrival had been anywhere other than Liverpool, I would probably dismissed them out of hand.
There is also a death for a William Mortimer in the June quarter 1901 in Chorlton but whose age is shown as 56 giving a potential d.o.b. of about 1845
In the meantime, you may be interested in looking at these sites
http://www.bing.com/search?q=Richard%20Sutton%20(Bart.)&PQ=ri&SP=1&QS=HS&SK=&sc=8-22&form=WLETSH&pc=WLEM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sutton_baronets
DNA is looking very likely now :-D
Allan
Edit; I'm wondering if, for whatever reason, William may have changed his name to Clifford.
Still more eliminations to be made before that potential hypothesis can be considered
|
|
JoonieCloonie
|
Report
|
29 Aug 2014 17:09 |
and we all seem to be on the same page here ...
the couple Joseph Mortimer and Jane Raine look to be the pair to focus on, even though it seems to leave Clifford being not a Mortimer, and a decade older than his claimed age ... neither of which is the least surprising to anybody who has been around many family trees :-)
where 'coach painter' might come into it ... hm, it could be one of those common amalgams where the groom gives his stepfather's name as father (especially if the surname matches the one he uses) but his real father's details like occupation ...
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
29 Aug 2014 16:56 |
Joonie ...............
we have our moments :-)
|
|
JoonieCloonie
|
Report
|
29 Aug 2014 16:46 |
good one on the 1861 Joseph you two, I had lighted on the one I posted earlier
1861 in Bury Lancashire Joseph Mortimer, married, 23, boarder, born London, house joiner(?)
but that was too hasty, it was the Bury connection that hooked me
Allan, the family story isn't too far-fetched to be real ... but in those situations it is generally more likely that the daddy is another member of the household staff than the head of household :-)
... although another option is the young master of the household, that was the case for the father of a great-aunt of mine when my gr-grandmother was a housemaid
the 1851 household in Leicestershire where Jane aged 30 was working has a 28-yr-old son who was an unmarried army captain ...
the DNA could tell the tale !!!
heh heh, someone has corrected son Francis's place of birth at Ancestry in 1901 ... Lincolnshire, not Liechtenstein :-S
the surname is also oft mistranscribed as Sutton rather than Satton
|