Find Ancestors
Welcome to the Genes Reunited community boards!
- The Genes Reunited community is made up of millions of people with similar interests. Discover your family history and make life long friends along the way.
- You will find a close knit but welcoming group of keen genealogists all prepared to offer advice and help to new members.
- And it's not all serious business. The boards are often a place to relax and be entertained by all kinds of subjects.
- The Genes community will go out of their way to help you, so don’t be shy about asking for help.
Quick Search
Single word search
Icons
- New posts
- No new posts
- Thread closed
- Stickied, new posts
- Stickied, no new posts
America Inbound Passengers/Emigrants 1851-1853
Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
Harris | Report | 8 Jan 2009 03:12 |
I'm looking for any ships passenger list information for the family of: |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 8 Jan 2009 03:43 |
Hi Harris, There is this, but nothing for David as yet unless he travelled separately? |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 8 Jan 2009 03:51 |
Well, it looks like David went on ahead in this: |
|||
|
Harris | Report | 8 Jan 2009 03:59 |
Hi "Hoping" |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 8 Jan 2009 04:05 |
Hi Harris, I have several ancestors who were christened literally 20 odd years after their birth dates, and quite often census records are 5 years out, so every date has to be questioned. Have you found david and martha on any census'? Regards Linda |
|||
|
Harris | Report | 8 Jan 2009 04:17 |
Hi "Hoping", |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 8 Jan 2009 04:26 |
Do you know if david and martha had any children after 1829 and before george and john. It wasn't common in those days to wait so long before the first birth. I haven't come across anything in the census either, (concentrated on 1841), so unless they were scottish or irish, it's all a bit odd! Oh, and my real name is Linda! |
|||
|
Harris | Report | 8 Jan 2009 04:39 |
Hi Linda, |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 8 Jan 2009 05:24 |
Do you have the 1860's US slave register which shows martha m kilgour b 1810 having 1 female slave aged 50yrs? Had a peep at the 1870's census and mary is not there as you say. Regards Linda |
|||
|
Harris | Report | 8 Jan 2009 05:34 |
Just re-checked my 1870 Baltimore census and David, Martha and John appear on it. Also John’s new family, David, Martha and Melville, but no wife. I don’t think the Martha M. female slave is part of this family. I do know that George died rather early, probably in his teen years in America. |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 8 Jan 2009 05:55 |
What the census shows is that Martha owned the slave, and the area is district 5, st marys, maryland, which I think is where they were living in 1870? And you probably already have this, but if not it would appear to be David 1809's birth? |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 8 Jan 2009 06:09 |
Look what I found. (You gotta know how to trick Ancestry. Kilg* didn't work, Hilg* didn't work, but Rilg* did the trick.) |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 8 Jan 2009 06:10 |
Oops, left out an important bit: |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 8 Jan 2009 06:10 |
Hi again, tried to save it and send but no joy I'm afraid. Davids occupation is definitely brass .???.................... so I'd say this is your guy. And Martha (following later) could quite often be mistranscribed as mary. The martha M who is the slave owner is the right age, etc, so I'd say she's also your martha, unless they went out to family. But to have 2 martha's, same age is a bit hard to swallow. If you want to message me your home address, I don't mind sending the images on, (don't put it on here!), although the quality is not that good. Alteratively you can get a 2 week trial of ancestry and get them that way. Regards Linda |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 8 Jan 2009 06:12 |
You are such a show off evie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Perhaps you can send harris the images from ancestry, my comp (and probably I) are too old!! Cheers Linda :) |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 8 Jan 2009 06:13 |
For the 1841, the image definitely says Kilgour. |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 8 Jan 2009 06:14 |
I just absolutely hate starting on something and finding *nothing*! You never know, maybe I make it up. ;) |
|||
|
EvieBeavie | Report | 8 Jan 2009 06:17 |
Fits for Martha: |
|||
|
Harris | Report | 8 Jan 2009 06:19 |
The only thing I can see on the top of the U.S. census for 1860 & 1870 is the 15th Ward and 16th Ward. I don’t know how this relates to District’s? You may be able to see this on the census descriptions somewhere? It would be interesting if this slave owner were this Martha, it would also tell me Martha’s middle name was “M” and approximate birth date, 1810. Does it give the slave lady’s name? I did actually have his birth details and parents names, although I haven’t seen him referred to as David “John” Kilgour, is that what the registry says? |
|||
|
Linda | Report | 8 Jan 2009 06:20 |
Yeaa!! Hadn't even tried to find poor martha,well done evie. And harris told me privately that david was a brass/iron moulder, so I think we've got his journey. Linda :) |