Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Andrew Daviid
|
Report
|
20 Jun 2010 15:44 |
thank you so much answering the question and for help me clear it up,
tresea bridget was the wife on the the marrige cretife
in 1905on the marriage cretificate as to the birth creitficate of james quinn i
have a cretified copy of an entry of birth issued for
the purpose of unemployment insureances act
sorry for the confused try to fraze it better next time
as it difficulit for me as i sudffer with the writting
disoder it not bad ( but from time to time) i tenb to
transpoese letter, (dylsiex) as you might of known, so please forgive any
mistake on my part and thank for clearing the age question up,
up, that make a lots of sense,
and againgi thank you all,
it mentinion his name his father and bridge his wife
my father james was born on 12 june 1912 john john quinn
was his fatrhew alogn with his brothrer matthew and john
accoriding to the 19 11 cenesus deila quinn was his wife for six years, and they may of parted company ie possible got a divoiced
|
|
Rambling
|
Report
|
20 Jun 2010 15:55 |
Not getting this with Delia though Andrew..?
Quinn / Gavican marriage 1905 Quinn/ Gavican birth 1912
not seeing where a second marriage figures? am I being thick lol
If the John married to Delia was married 6 years by 1911 and is the right one ...then 'Delia' Must be Teresa Gavican..there is no second wife??
|
|
Andrew Daviid
|
Report
|
24 Jun 2010 16:53 |
i think i finaly track down micheal gavican but would like conformation that i have the right one, i found micheal married to marry murry who have a bridget gavican in 1843, so that mean that birget is just two years out, with age on the marrige certifcert i have for 1905
i found him using family search.org
batch no c701711 dates 1830-1862 source call no. 0989745
type film printout call is none and the next one is type (but noting found) so i petty certian this could be them but it would be nice to just have it confirm, from sombody else, as bridget was age 30 in 1905 so if you take 30 away from around 1875 and if you add 30 to 1843 1873 so only two year out, and see i can't any other michael for her father, i hope i have hit the jackpot witht this one, which meam great grand parents, i have possible found thank you andy
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
24 Jun 2010 17:20 |
Ooooh, I don't think any of that makes any sense!
For the name Bridget Gavican, the IGI has two births/christenings:
Bridget [Gavican] Christening: 03 AUG 1843 Roman Catholic, Strokestown, Roscommon, Ireland Father: Michael Gavican Mother: Mary Murry Batch No.: C701711
This one is way way too old to be the one who married in 1905,. You can't subtract 30 *twice*! Someone who was about 30 in 1905 was born about 1875. Not 1843!
The other one is
Bridget Gavican Birth: 30 NOV 1874 , , Ireland Father: John Gavican Mother: Honoria Tiernan Batch No.: I024675
Now, that one was "submitted" by someone. There is no confirmation that it is true.
But -- you're looking for a Teresa, who married in 1905, not a Bridget, aren't you??
Oh, except I see that on the 1912 birth certificate, the mother was called "Bridget"?
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
24 Jun 2010 17:52 |
I checked the parishes available in the IGI, at Hugh Wallis's batch number site.
In 1911: John Quinn was born in Ballyhaunis, county Mayo "Delia" was born in Delvin, county Westmeath
Neither one of those places is included in the batches in the IGI.
So searching at familysearch.org for their births isn't going to find them, unfortunately.
|
|
Andrew Daviid
|
Report
|
24 Jun 2010 18:07 |
good evening janey
i will try and make myself a lltttle clearer this time as english and maths were never my stonger subject at school, so here i are the detail as i see them
my grandmothre was acooriding to the our marriage certificate in 1905 in which they both age 30 at the time, when they got married.
her full name was tresea birget gavican
which is on the 1905 cetiifacte that i have and and for some reason unknow to me,(yet to be found out) delia. show up as his wife for six years
on the 1911 cenues, and not bridget tresea gavican, who one would assume should be on it,
and plus on the 1905 marriage cretifcte that i have it name a micheal for the father and their is no mention of a john for the father,,
but she was married to a john quinn who father was james quinn he was a famer as both father were famers, . i know it very complicate that why i want to asking all you good people to help make sense of it all,
hear a litllbit of extra information johne quinn was living at bodoen walk or bollen walk wilmslow(writing ver faint) and she was living at ladyfeild treance wilmslow (writing very faint)
hopeing with luck i might of made my self a littler clear this time sorry for the confurison, i aprrecation any help i can get you been great,and a real thelp to me without people like you would not be where i am now, as on my mother side gone bac to 17090 which is dare more ever hope for., andy
|
|
Andrew Daviid
|
Report
|
24 Jun 2010 18:10 |
sorry fo the typo, is should read 1790 (which make more sense, got bad eyesight, from dinking to much beer) hee,ee
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
24 Jun 2010 19:36 |
I looked around for both of them in 1901 in England for quite some time this afternoon, with no luck at all. (Trying by first name only, last name only, as Teresa or Bridget or Delia, etc etc.) I also looked for their deaths, as all possible names, but no luck with that either!
One thing to note is that the spelling of Irish surnames in English records can get a little wonky.
It's worth keeping things like GAVIGAN and GAVIGHAN in mind too, and then of course Ancestry mistranscribes it as things like GARICAN.
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
24 Jun 2010 19:44 |
LADYFIELD TERRACE and BOLLIN WALK
are both in Wilmslow in 1911.
Unfortunately there are several households on each of them, and no Gavican or Quinn among them.
I searched in the 1881 census (which can be searched by address) and found that Bollin Walk is in a place called Bollin Fee, in Wilmslow subdistrict, Bucklow district.
I searched the 1901 for everyone in Bollin Fee born 1870-1880, but they just aren't there, it seems. :(
|
|
Andrew Daviid
|
Report
|
24 Jun 2010 21:27 |
thank you for you time and troubel, that you spent, on it i do apprctie the time and effort one put in
so i thank you again,
andy
|
|
Andrew Daviid
|
Report
|
26 Jun 2010 08:27 |
hi evey one my 6 months membership come to an end in week or so time i won't be renewaling my membership right way as
going on a week hoilday to lovley conrwall(ie bude) just a fab place but one i back and got my routine settle in i def rejoined for the whole year
as all you people have been a big hep to me with the time and effort you put into helping people like me so i just want to say a very big
T H A N K Y O U TO YOU ALL
ANDY
|
|
MaureeninNY
|
Report
|
26 Jun 2010 08:55 |
Andy, How very kind of you to thank all of us.
Enjoy your holiday in Cornwall!!
Best, Maureen
|