Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
MaureeninNY
|
Report
|
2 Apr 2009 12:43 |
Oddly,there's also this scenario for Annie: 1881 Name: Annie Pleasants Age: 4 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1877 Gender: Female Where born: Middlesex, England Civil Parish: Hamlet County/Island: London Country: England Street address: 130 Old Ch Rd Registration district: Mile End Old Town Sub registration district: Mile End Old Town, Western Robert Pleasants 49 Kerenhappach Pleasants 49 Robert Pleasants 29 Rebecca Pleasants 16 Adelaide Pleasants 14 Alice Pleasants 12 Harry Pleasants 10 Annie Pleasants 4 Charles Day 24 Citation: Class: RG11; Piece: 476; Folio: 31; Page: 2;
1891 Name: Hannah Pleasant Age: 14 Estimated Birth Year: abt 1877 Relation: Daughter Mother's Name: Keren H Gender: Female Where born: Stepney, London, England Civil Parish: Mile End Old Town Ecclesiastical parish: Stepney St Dunstan County/Island: London Country: England Street address:130 Old Church Road Registration district: Mile End Old Town Sub registration district: Mile End Old Town, Western Household Members: Name Age Keren H Pleasant 58 Robert Pleasant 39 Harry Pleasant 19 Hannah Pleasant 14 Andrew Pleasant 7 Thomas Needham 20 Source Citation: Class: RG12; Piece: 304; Folio 10; Page 15
FreeBMD Marriages Mar 1851 Cockrell Kerenhappuck Colchester 12 83 Pleasants Robert Colchester 12 83
This is about the only birth that would fit with "their Annie". I wonder if she just changed her middle name??
Births Mar 1877 PLEASANTS Annie Kerenhappuch Mile End 1c 556
Oh well,the marriage cert will (hopefully) reveal all!
Maureen
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
2 Apr 2009 13:27 |
Well spotted Maureen !!
This is strange indeed! - I didn't realise - I had seen that birth and knew it would be connected but didn't think of it as being Annie Louisa.
'Kerenthingywhatsit??' is the one I have shown living with George and Annie on 1901 in Heath Street.
I had traced that she had a son Walter born c 1857 and therefore assumed she was Annie's Grandmother !! and Robert her uncle ??
This just shows the importance of confirming with certificates as this also is a 'very good fit'!
They are obviously all from the same family!
I will explore further........
Dea x
|
|
Heather
|
Report
|
2 Apr 2009 13:38 |
Am I getting deja vu here?
Hmm
http://www.genesreunited.com/boards.asp?wci=thread&tk=1139193
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
2 Apr 2009 13:51 |
THANK YOU HEATHER !!!!!!!!!!
I do wish people would not do this - starting several threads.
My only consolation is that most of the info I have spent hours 'slogging away' to find is not already on the other thread - However it could have been a complete waste of my (and other people's) time, which makes me very angry !!
I think I will put this on hold and wait for some further info from Colette !
Dea x
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
2 Apr 2009 13:57 |
Just adding this for Maureen...
I have stopped exploring this one for now but just to let you know - I had a look at the 1881 image where Annie was with 'K...........".
All the others were named as sons and daughters but Annie didn't have anything there - perhaps she was a 'grandaughter'? as I can't find her on 1881 with Walter.
The baffling thing is though that there remains the birth reg which you also found! - this would still seem to fit.
Dea x
|
|
MaureeninNY
|
Report
|
2 Apr 2009 14:11 |
Dea, I was thinking the same thing as Kerzit's is getting a little old to be the mother. And she sure isn't Andrew's mother (on the 1891)-I hope!!!! Wonder what thread the marriage cert results will pop up on?????
Maureen
|
|
Heather
|
Report
|
2 Apr 2009 14:22 |
Im afraid I tend not to slog nowdays :) I wait for solid info to be produced first.:) to show some effort on the part of posters.
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
2 Apr 2009 14:37 |
You are very wise Heather - I really MUST train myself to resist!
Unfortunately, I fear I am 'obsessed' - like a dog with a bone, as they say !!
I will work on it !!
Dea x
|
|
Heather
|
Report
|
2 Apr 2009 15:17 |
I know what you mean Dea. But it happens so often now. Little bit of info and a whole history produced for someone and they either dont come back or come back and say, Oh, his name was Jack, not Fred.
Im too old to waste my eyes looking :) Once people come up with some solid info they have sought out then I put in my pennysworth :)
|
|
Colette
|
Report
|
2 Apr 2009 18:02 |
Sorry I havent replied sooner been very busy at work today. Firstly let me thank you all for helping, you have uncovered a great deal and as soon as the certs come back I hope to match it up :).
I truly appreciate everything you all do, the things you find are amazing....... it takes me hours and hours maybe even days to find even one little thing.
The other thread was made after this thread, and in the new thread I did post the link to this thread so people could see what others had found in searches etc etc I thought I was doing the right thing im very sorry and I wont do it again.
Once again im sorry but thanks a million to you all, a lot of great findings there.
Will post as soon as the certs come back
Take care Have a great day Colette
|
|
Dea
|
Report
|
2 Apr 2009 18:20 |
Hi Colette,
Don't worry - I can see that you DID try to do it right by posting a link to this thread but it was still wrong to start another as people didn't realise from searching on the original that there was a second.!!- You were not to know - we all have to learn.
Anyway, when you get the info from the cert, please post it on the original so we can try to help you further.
Best wishes,
Dea x
|