Profile | Posted by | Options | Post Date |
|
Lesley
|
Report
|
3 Oct 2010 11:53 |
Have found records for 1891 and 1901, other years missing. Family, mother Rose or Rosalind Eugine Bevan born Donnington, Berks 1855. Children, 3 daughters (one named Flora) one son, Alexander Meredith Bevan born 1891, London. All children born in London between 1881 and 1891. Family lived in Portsea, Hants per 1891 census. Mother was either the daughter or daughter in law of Commander George Baring Browne Collier, born 1817, and his wife, Justina Maria Stepney Gulston born Brighton, Sussex 1820. Trying to find information regarding my grandfather, Alexander Meredith Bevan, born 1891. Any information much appreciated.
|
|
patchem
|
Report
|
3 Oct 2010 12:00 |
1861 England Census Justina Collin [Justina Gulston] Age: 41 Estimated birth year: abt 1820 Relation: Daughter Mother's Name: Ann Maria Gulston Gender: Female Where born: Brighton, Sussex, England Civil parish: Cheltenham Ecclesiastical parish: St Mary County/Island: Gloucestershire Country: England Registration district: Cheltenham Sub-registration district: Cheltenham ED, institution, or vessel: 6 household schedule number: 108 Ann Maria Gulston 72 head gentlewoman widow Christchurch Surrey Geo Boring Collin 44 son in law Richmond Surrey Lieut Royal Navy Half Pay Justina Collin 41 Brighton Sussex Ernest Collin 14 Portsea Hants Flora Courtonud Collin 10 London Middlesex Clotilda Hapney Collin 9 Rosalind Hapney Collin 6 Magnell Cornwall Collin 2 Reginald Collin 7 MO Henry Hatchet 55 servants Fanny Commins 22 Charlotte Leach 37 Mary Bowe 32 Mary Ann Peerson 32 Selina Kelly 32 Jane Priest 16 Mary Hartridge 16 Source Citation: Class: RG9; Piece: 1797; Folio: 137; Page: 26; GSU roll: 542869.
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
3 Oct 2010 12:00 |
1881 England Census about Rosalind Bevan Name: Rosalind Bevan Age: 24 Estimated birth year: abt 1857 Relation: Daughter Spouse's name: Meredith Bevan Parent's Name: Stepney Collier Gender: Female Where born: Donnington, Berkshire, England Civil parish: Kensington County/Island: London Country: England Street Address: 22 Oxford Gardens Condition as to marriage: Married Registration district: Kensington Sub-registration district: Kensington Town ED, institution, or vessel: 47b Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age Stepney Collier 59 Reginald Collier 20 Meredith Bevan 28 Rosalind Bevan 24 Elizabeth Hunter 29 Anne Kendall 29 Anne Mary Cook 23
|
|
RutlandBelle
|
Report
|
3 Oct 2010 12:01 |
baptism Name: Alexander Meredith Bevan Estimated Birth Date: 28 Jul 1889 Father's Name: Meredith Bevan Mother's Name: Rosalind Eugenie Bevan County: Middlesex
address is 2 Broadhurst Gdns and father's occ is 'Gentleman'
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
3 Oct 2010 12:04 |
England & Wales, FreeBMD Birth Index, 1837-1915 about Rosalind Eugenie Collier Name: Rosalind Eugenie Collier Year of Registration: 1854 Quarter of Registration: Oct-Nov-Dec District: Newbury County: Berkshire, Hampshire Volume: 2c Page: 191 (click to see others on page)
|
|
PricklyHolly
|
Report
|
3 Oct 2010 12:04 |
Surname First name(s) Age District Vol Page Deaths Dec 1916 (>99%) Bevan Rosalind E 62 Southampton 2c 33
|
|
KathleenBell
|
Report
|
3 Oct 2010 12:04 |
For reference only
Is this the right family in 1891 (if so her mother is not called Justina):-
Name: Rose Bevan Age: 36 Estimated birth year: abt 1855 Relation: Head Gender: Female Where born: Donnington, Berkshire, England Civil parish: Portsea Ecclesiastical parish: St Simon County/Island: Hampshire Country: England Street Address:
Occupation:
Condition as to marriage:
Education:
Employment status:
View image Registration district: Portsea Island Sub-registration district: Landport ED, institution, or vessel: 68 Neighbors: View others on page Household Members: Name Age
Rose Bevan 36 Violet Bevan 9 Dora Bevan 7 Margorie Bevan 6 Alexander Bevan 1
Source Citation: Class: RG12; Piece: 876; Folio 128; Page 35; GSU roll: 6095986.
EDIT - I see her mother is using a middle name - Stepney.
Kath. x
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
3 Oct 2010 12:05 |
London, England, Marriages and Banns, 1754-1921 about Rosalind Eugenie Collier Name: Rosalind Eugenie Collier Spouse Name: Meredith Bevan<<<<Gentleman Spouse Age: Full Age Record Type: Marriage Marriage Date: 29 Oct 1879 Parish: St Michael and All Angels, Ladbroke Grove County: Middlesex Borough: Kensington and Chelsea Father Name: George Baring Collier <<<Gentleman Spouse Father Name: Mereddith Bevan <<<Gentleman
|
|
KathleenBell
|
Report
|
3 Oct 2010 12:08 |
GRO reference for the marriage certificate:-
Name: Rosalind Eugenie Collier Year of Registration: 1879 Quarter of Registration: Oct-Nov-Dec District: Kensington County: Greater London, London, Middlesex Volume: 1a Page: 148
Kath. x
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
3 Oct 2010 12:14 |
England & Wales, National Probate Calendar (Index of Wills and Administrations),1861-1941 about George Baring Browne Collier <<Commander in the RN Name: George Baring Browne Collier Probate Date: 29 Jan 1891 Death Date: 11 Mar 1890 Death Place: Middlesex, England Registry: Principal Registry
Left £16383 9s 8d
|
|
Gee
|
Report
|
3 Oct 2010 12:27 |
British Army WWI Service Records, 1914-1920 about Alexander Meredith Bevan Name: Alexander Meredith Bevan Estimated birth year: abt 1889 Age at Enlistment: 28 Residence: Northbrook Road, Southampton Document Year: 1917 Regimental Number: 60120 Number of Images: 12
I can email you the record if you PM me your email address
|
|
PricklyHolly
|
Report
|
3 Oct 2010 12:27 |
British Army WWI Service Records, 1914-1920 about Alexander Meredith Bevan Name: Alexander Meredith Bevan Estimated birth year: abt 1889 Age at Enlistment: 28 Residence: Northbrook Road, Southampton Document Year: 1917 Regimental Number: 60120 Number of Images: 12
|
|
PricklyHolly
|
Report
|
3 Oct 2010 12:31 |
Marriages Mar 1914 (>99%) BEVAN Alexander M Vale Southampton 2c 83 Vale Florence G Bevan Southampton 2c 83
|
|
Lesley
|
Report
|
3 Oct 2010 21:33 |
Alexander Meredith BEVAN (born London 1891) may have moved to Australia after March 1924. Could someone please check ship passenger lists? Thank you!
|
|
patchem
|
Report
|
3 Oct 2010 22:18 |
Lesley, If you knew all the information that has been found, it would have been useful to mention this at the start, so we did not waste our time. If you did not know, it would have been nice for you to acknowledge all the work that has been done for you.
|
|
Lesley
|
Report
|
3 Oct 2010 23:26 |
Patricia,
I did NOT know ALL the information contained in this posting before I requested help. As stated, I found my family in the 1891 census and the 1901 census. The information gleaned from this posting has confirmed and added to what I already knew. In the 1891 census it does not mention my g.grandfather's name or all their children. In the 1861 census, that I could not find and was kindly supplied by one of the respondents, it gives me this information and has, therefore, added to my knowledge of my family. Surely, that is the point of a 'help' posting, to expand what we already know? I started off this posting with all the information about my grandfather that I had to date.
I had (prior to your posting above) already written to all respondents individually, thanking them for their very generous help in researching my family INCLUDING YOURSELF! AND I also posted, prior to your comment, a general thank you to all concerned!
Earlier today you sent me a personal email requesting that I check what had been written on this post to date. The reason for what you considered 'a delay' in responding to that information is that I live 7,000 miles from the UK in a different time zone. Hence the delay in responding IMMEDIATELY to any information. I think you need to take this into consideration and not assume that everyone posting on this site lives in the UK time zone.
Once again I would like to thank all those who were generous enough to give of their time to help me find additional members of my family and to expand my family tree for future generations to enjoy. Your help is invaluable to those of us who request help and genuinely appreciated by all.
|
|
SylviaInCanada
|
Report
|
4 Oct 2010 01:14 |
Lesley
to avoid this kind of comment ...... and yes, I was about to post something like "wot? no thanks for the help received" after having read all the way through ....... may I suggest that in future, you post your thank yous ON THE THREAD itself.
We helpers all like a little bit of acknowledgement ........... and we do look on threads for such. We don't need individual pms
as I said, I was taken aback when I saw your second question without an apparent acknowledgment whatsoever of what had been found for you!
it's so easy to do a thank you posting!
sylvia
|
|
JaneyCanuck
|
Report
|
4 Oct 2010 01:35 |
And in fact a majority of responses on page 1 were added within **15 minutes** of the initial post.
I know I get tired of being told what busy lives people lead and how they can't sit at their keyboards 24/7 waiting for other members here, who obviously have no lives, to give answers to their questions. It is considered appropriate to wait a few minutes to see whether there are questions and replies.
In fact, there's a helpful post from the site management pinned at the top of the TTF board that says just that. You won't see it if you're reading a "surname board". You'll have to click at the top of that board where it says "click here" to see where everyone else is reading your post, in among all the many other requests for help.
I saw no general thanks, just the "any info appreciated" in the opening post. And a "thank you!" after another request. Those don't sound like thanks for info already received. It just isn't hard to type those few extra words.
|
|
Lesley
|
Report
|
4 Oct 2010 19:51 |
All the people who responded with information also emailed me privately and I responded to each one by return email and thanked them for their help. None of them wrote back suggesting that I publicly acknowledge their good deed. I do not know ALL the in's and out's of this website, I am new to this. I had no idea that people might respond within 15 minutes and had I known that I would probably have returned to the website at that time eager for information. I thought waiting 24 hours to see if ANYONE responded was the best course of action.
|
|
Lesley
|
Report
|
4 Oct 2010 20:03 |
Lesley 2nd October 2010 08:29 Request review
Heartfelt thanks for all the information you supplied about my family. I am very grateful.
(This is the general thank you I posted, retrieved from my threads.)
|